1. Standard memberThequ1ck
    Fast above
    Slow Below
    Joined
    29 Sep '03
    Moves
    25914
    16 Feb '13 23:39
    Originally posted by OdBod
    I believe it involved slow incremental changes similar to the development of a complex eye .
    The evolution of the human eye serves a useful sensory function. But consider that
    the building of such a complex mechanism could inevitably influence the generation
    and formation of other organs.

    We tend to think of genetics as compartmentalised. The eye evolved like this, fingers
    and thumbs evolved like that. However.
    We now know that neighbouring genes are able to regulate each other and indeed
    local, non-coding sequences can also have extensive influence during
    transcription.

    For examples sake, people who have folds in their ear lobes are more likely to
    suffer from heart disease as the genes are co-located.

    Slow, incremental changes may weadle down the alterations made by positive
    selection or, if they are of no consequence, they may remain.

    Considering this scenario. On the one hand an increase in the number of sweat
    glands may serve a directly useful function (greater cooling
    ability) which may have been selected for.
    On the other hand stronger, thicker hair may have been positively selected for
    by sexual preference or social trend and an increase in sweat glands having either
    an additionally useful purpose or not making enough of a difference for negative
    selection to occur.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree