Suppose peace broke out on Earth and the economy soared. The UN elects you as head of the "create new cool stuff" division. Every nation is taxed to pay for your technological wonders. Your genius is recognized.
What could you make, or accomplish? What could humanity really do?
Some ideas...
Cryogenic storage of humans and other animals a la Aliens.
Nuclear Pulse Propulsion technology for space travel
Railguns
Fusion power generators
Robots and drones
Cyborgs with various machines embedded - internal cell phones, Internet Explorer HUD, enhanced eyes with night vision, extra strength and toughness, a brain with a built in computer for calculations and information storage, remote controls for other machines, weaponry
Generation Ships for interstellar travel
Greatly elongated life
Biological "machines" which result from extensive breeding and genetic manipulation
Laser weapons
Explosive Reactive Armor with an automated reloading mechanism to replace the tiles after they go off
Video camera/projector based invisibility
Partial mind control (maybe a gun that electrically or otherwise creates intense terror, etc)
Mind reading machines
Evolved humans leading to different species e.g. War of the Worlds' aliens that were nothing but fingers, brains and sense organs because they had technology for all else, or the once-human species in Isaac Asimov's Foundation series.
Kinetic Bombardment AKA Thor Shots
Actively burrowing "smart" weapons/one use suicide gopher robots
Dyson Swarms of solar energy collectors
Mind control via organism or machine that is directly linked to the spine and brain
What Isaac Asimov called "Psychohistory" - the refinement of statistical sociology/psychology to the point of mathematical precision and the ability to predict the future in a limited sense due to this
Space Elevator
Completely artificial organisms
Vortex Ring Guns
Sonic weapons
Microwave weapons
Ring shaped space stations with artificial gravity a la Niven's Ringworld or the Haloes from the Halo games.
Any other ideas?
Originally posted by AThousandYoungIf peace on Earth broke out, anyone being made head of this division and spending all their effort developing weapons seriously needs a slap.
Railguns
Laser weapons
Explosive Reactive Armor with an automated reloading mechanism to replace the tiles after they go off
Partial mind control (maybe a gun that electrically or otherwise creates intense terror, etc)
Kinetic Bombardment AKA Thor Shots
Actively burrowing "smart" weapons/one use suicide gopher robots
Vortex Ring Guns
Sonic weapons
Microwave weapons
Originally posted by AThousandYoungWeightless games in space: I envisioned a space station, big one, with a rec room where you would have 3D billiards or some variation, maybe with magnetically charged balls, a large (~2 meter long and ~1.5 meter wide egg shaped) table with the balls starting off in mid air, carefully placed and holes all around the skin of the egg, just big enough, say one cm or less, for the Que stick to enter and be able to aim at various angles and there would be say, 6, holes big enough for the balls to exit and collect in a little magnetically charged bag or electrically charged to attract the balls.
Suppose peace broke out on Earth and the economy soared. The UN elects you as head of the "create new cool stuff" division. Every nation is taxed to pay for your technological wonders. Your genius is recognized.
What could you make, or accomplish? What could humanity really do?
Some ideas...
Cryogenic storage of humans and other animals a ...[text shortened]... gravity a la Niven's Ringworld or the Haloes from the Halo games.
Any other ideas?
Seems like a blast to play with such a ellipsoidal shaped table.
Or tennis on the moon in a large indoor room, versions where you play in spacesuits outside with no air and versions played inside with normal air. How would the dynamics of the game differ from the Earth bound form?
Swimming in a weightless sphere where you have oxygen tanks and play some form of underwater soccer or football.
Playing some form of soccer on the inside skin of a fast rotating large wheel, ~1 Km in radius but with enough side forces to throw off regular calculations of thrown or kicked ball trajectories.
3D version of that laser/mirror game where you have various block shaped reflectors that people place in 3D space to change the path of a laser beam so at the end one side or the other gets the laser beam to his port in spite of the moves of the opponent.
These are some of the games I would develop if I lived in a future space enabled society. What do you think?
Originally posted by AThousandYoungElongated life should take first priority, including cures for some of the worst diseases and a cure for 'ageing'.
What could you make, or accomplish? What could humanity really do?
.....
Greatly elongated life
.....
Artificial intelligence should probably be next as it has the potential to revolutionize scientific endeavor. Highly intelligent machines could achieve all your other goals at a much lower cost.
Originally posted by twhiteheadLonger lives, like 2 or 3 hundred years, would severely strain any civilization. If everyone hung around that long, the population would go to 100 billion. If you thought the world overcrowded now....
Elongated life should take first priority, including cures for some of the worst diseases and a cure for 'ageing'.
So that would require a greatly reduced birthrate and therefore a stagnant society where the extreme elders would be greatly motivated to maintain the status quo and to keep the mere 100 year olds from gaining power and the teenagers? Pariahs. What few of them there would be.
What kind of society would it be if a sports star like Roger Federer at the age of 300 was still # 1 in the world of tennis, what kind of dynamics would there be in the sport if all you saw was the same individual winning tournaments decade after decade, century after century? While it would be nice to see sports stars have a longer professional life, say 50 years like writers or musicians, 3 or 4 hundred years? Untenable.
If something like that were to come about, it would seem likely to ban players for some period of time, say 10 years minimum, to allow others to shine for awhile.
Indeed, banning people from any profession after 50 years or some such, you reach a pinnacle of some trade or profession, retire from that by law, then start over with something new, maybe an archeologist becoming a minister or a singer becoming a race car driver or something, anything but what they were before.
Here's one - a machine that intercepts the signal to cause pain and gives a pop up window in your mind with an annoying sound effect instead of pain...
"Curses, I cannot focus with that stupid buzzing in my ears...yes, I know I shattered my thigh bone, but can't we turn this off? Oh wait, that would hurt really bad...never mind."
Originally posted by sonhouseI think the change in profession would/could happen naturally. People would get deathly bored of their profession whether they were at the top of it or not.
Longer lives, like 2 or 3 hundred years, would severely strain any civilization. If everyone hung around that long, the population would go to 100 billion. If you thought the world overcrowded now....
So that would require a greatly reduced birthrate and therefore a stagnant society where the extreme elders would be greatly motivated to maintain the stat ...[text shortened]... inister or a singer becoming a race car driver or something, anything but what they were before.
The problem there would be that people would want to change careers and maintain their standard of living.
Originally posted by sonhouseI am not convinced the world is overcrowded now.
Longer lives, like 2 or 3 hundred years, would severely strain any civilization. If everyone hung around that long, the population would go to 100 billion. If you thought the world overcrowded now....
The problem with increased longevity is nothing new. First world countries already have life expectancies almost double that of the past (and current third world countries). One of the biggest problems however tend to be the fact that the older people do not work. If we truly cure aging, it may be possible to continue working in 'old age'.
Population control will always be an issue, but surely it is more humane to control the birth rate (as in China) than to control the death rate (by refusing to cure disease or increase longevity) as you seem to be suggesting.
I guess we could always introduce mandatory death at 500 years old.
In reality, as lifespans and wealth increase, birthrates go down.
I think that in this scenario any increased population would be manageable as long as some other developments went alongside it.
- a cheap, plentiful source of energy (fusion, efficient capture of solar energy, extracting energy from quantum foam, whatever)
- more efficient food manufacturing
- (beyond a certain point) the ability to colonise space and/or other planets
Originally posted by mtthwThe only problem with that scenario is with 'just' the 6 or 7 billion we have now, we are already using up close to 50% of the entire planetary resources. Already we are running out of fresh water, of course an infinite supply of energy from whatever could make fresh out of salt water or to divert a water comet into close orbit around the Earth and use a space elevator to melt, purify, and bring that water down to Earth or some such but for now that kind of thinking is pure pipe dream, we have to work with what we have.
I think that in this scenario any increased population would be manageable as long as some other developments went alongside it.
- a cheap, plentiful source of energy (fusion, efficient capture of solar energy, extracting energy from quantum foam, whatever)
- more efficient food manufacturing
- (beyond a certain point) the ability to colonise space and/or other planets
For instance, there is a multi-pronged effort to achieve nuclear fusion through several techniques but it is not at all certain ANY of those projects will bear fruit. If they don't, you can bet we will stay on the Earth with not much in the way of a space program, we cannot get into space in a big way with just chemical propulsion, so a lot of basic physics has to be developed to make any of those dreams come true.
Originally posted by sonhouseWell, that was my whole point - effort would need to be put into something that would increase those resources. It's not an entirely realistic discussion, is it?
The only problem with that scenario is with 'just' the 6 or 7 billion we have now, we are already using up close to 50% of the entire planetary resources.
Originally posted by AThousandYoungWhy so many weapons?
Suppose peace broke out on Earth and the economy soared. The UN elects you as head of the "create new cool stuff" division. Every nation is taxed to pay for your technological wonders. Your genius is recognized.
What could you make, or accomplish? What could humanity really do?
Some ideas...
Cryogenic storage of humans and other animals a ...[text shortened]... gravity a la Niven's Ringworld or the Haloes from the Halo games.
Any other ideas?