Go back
Intelligent design attorney taken apart

Intelligent design attorney taken apart

Science

Vote Up
Vote Down

http://www.cspan.org/Series/Washington-Journal.aspx

May 27, 2008
Rev. Barry Lynn, Americans United for Separation of Church & State, Executive Director and Edward Sisson, Intelligent Design Attorney have a discussion on the 1968 Supreme Court case of Epperson v. Arkansas. The 9-0 decision overturned an Arkansas law, which prohibited teachers in public schools from teaching, or using textbooks that teach, human evolution.


Real Player needed: 58 min
rtsp://video1.c-span.org/15days/wj052708_lynn.rm


What a lovely thing to see....
We need more Reverends like this out there.

Vote Up
Vote Down

I was hoping he was physically dismembered. Another disappointing article!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
I was hoping he was physically dismembered. Another disappointing article!
Sorry Shav, only a verbal dismemberment, but, my God, the Reverend really put that guy in his place.

The one point he slipped, in my opinion, is when the attorney said he had a better understanding in science because he had a science degree from MIT. He also had previously said it was in architecture or some such - a design subject, rather than "real science".

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scottishinnz
Sorry Shav, only a verbal dismemberment, but, my God, the Reverend really put that guy in his place.

The one point he slipped, in my opinion, is when the attorney said he had a better understanding in science because he had a science degree from MIT. He also had previously said it was in architecture or some such - a design subject, rather than "real science".
What? That CSPAN Program with the Evolutionist clergy and the ID MIT grad?

That was no super victory for the Evo Clergy guy.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scottishinnz
http://www.cspan.org/Series/Washington-Journal.aspx

May 27, 2008
Rev. Barry Lynn, Americans United for Separation of Church & State, Executive Director and Edward Sisson, Intelligent Design Attorney have a discussion on the 1968 Supreme Court case of Epperson v. Arkansas. The 9-0 decision overturned an Arkansas law, which prohibited teachers in publ ...[text shortened]... j052708_lynn.rm


What a lovely thing to see....
We need more Reverends like this out there.
=============================
What a lovely thing to see....
We need more Reverends like this out there.
=================================



You have plenty of them. And your house of cards is still slowly crumbling like South African Apartied or the Berlin Wall.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by jaywill
[b]=============================
What a lovely thing to see....
We need more Reverends like this out there.
=================================



You have plenty of them. And your house of cards is still slowly crumbling like South African Apartied or the Berlin Wall.[/b]
I hate to agree, but you're somewhat right. Science and the standards of science in this country are being slowly eroded by the ridiculous theocratic factions that would rather us teach the bible than reality in science class.

It's a shame really.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by PsychoPawn
I hate to agree, but you're somewhat right. Science and the standards of science in this country are being slowly eroded by the ridiculous theocratic factions that would rather us teach the bible than reality in science class.

It's a shame really.
I'm so gleeful. There's NO COMPETENT COMPETITION out there for my job as science teacher!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
I'm so gleeful. There's NO COMPETENT COMPETITION out there for my job as science teacher!
Unfortunately, the school boards who peddle this nonsense don't want competent people.