01 Aug '14 01:04>
Mercury, radiation and maybe other things that are not good are in tuna.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/canned-tuna-may-contain-excessive-mercury/
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/04/28/fukushima-radiation-oregon-tuna/8436187/
This got me wondering how researchers determine what levels of mercury are safe and what levels of radiation are safe. Then I started thinking about how other foods that have pesticides, herbicides and other things on or in them can contribute to cancer and other illnesses. Maybe individually some things can be eaten without too much worry, but what if combining all of these foods in your diet can lead to illness later in life? Considering this, is the standard for safe levels of poison in your food correct?
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/canned-tuna-may-contain-excessive-mercury/
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/04/28/fukushima-radiation-oregon-tuna/8436187/
This got me wondering how researchers determine what levels of mercury are safe and what levels of radiation are safe. Then I started thinking about how other foods that have pesticides, herbicides and other things on or in them can contribute to cancer and other illnesses. Maybe individually some things can be eaten without too much worry, but what if combining all of these foods in your diet can lead to illness later in life? Considering this, is the standard for safe levels of poison in your food correct?