21 Jun '18 17:30>1 edit
Sonhouse stated in a prior thread that kombucha causes liver failure. I accept that there is no scientific evidence (seems like the jury is still deliberating) for the broadly defined health benefits, but does it really kill people? And if so, why is it everywhere for public consumption with no warning labels?
Per wikipedia:
"Adverse effects associated with kombucha consumption include severe hepatic (liver) and renal (kidney) toxicity as well as metabolic acidosis. At least one person is known to have died after consuming kombucha, though the drink itself has never been conclusively proved a cause of death."
The references here refer to studies that show that "kombucha consumption may impact the results of laboratory test results" and another that describes patients with liver failure and also states "They both drank Kombusha tea in ceramic container, which was covered by glaze made of lead."
It seems like if the risk is there for adverse health effects (and death), they shouldn't be putting huge jars of it in the middle of the grocery store with no warning label. Right?
Per wikipedia:
"Adverse effects associated with kombucha consumption include severe hepatic (liver) and renal (kidney) toxicity as well as metabolic acidosis. At least one person is known to have died after consuming kombucha, though the drink itself has never been conclusively proved a cause of death."
The references here refer to studies that show that "kombucha consumption may impact the results of laboratory test results" and another that describes patients with liver failure and also states "They both drank Kombusha tea in ceramic container, which was covered by glaze made of lead."
It seems like if the risk is there for adverse health effects (and death), they shouldn't be putting huge jars of it in the middle of the grocery store with no warning label. Right?