Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Science Forum

Science Forum

  1. Subscriber sonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    11 May '18 03:04
    YouTube

    Sorry Freaky, this nails it even for you.
  2. Subscriber FreakyKBH
    Acquired Taste...
    11 May '18 15:52
    Originally posted by @sonhouse
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVa2UmgdTM4

    Sorry Freaky, this nails it even for you.
    I shouldn't have to point it out, but.

    According to your go-to-but-never-works-because-you-don't-know-how-it-works-or-applies, i.e., light refraction.
    Does it only work on ambient light?
    Or does it work on laser scatter, too?
    Is that light scattering up--- due to refraction caused by atmospheric conditions?

    Also...
    Why so many moving parts?
    Why so many extra points of transference?
    Simple--- super simple--- three objects between two points over flat water:

    Eye
    Camera/Telescope
    Distant (20-30+ miles) Object

    No fluctuating elevation.
    Reliance on single mechanical device.
    Basic Pythagorean math.
    Easy peasy.
  3. 11 May '18 17:00 / 4 edits
    Originally posted by @freakykbh
    Is that light scattering up--- due to refraction caused by atmospheric conditions?
    No, not with, as you said above, "scattering". And that would make no sense for a lazer beam anyway.
    Particles that scatter light (such as fog particles) wouldn't just scatter light 'up' but sideways and down thus a scattering effect would mean the lazer beam would not be seen to stay narrow, as it did in that film, but spread out in many directions and blur over a very wide area. The same is true for Rayleigh scattering from air molecules.
    The only simple and reasonable explanation for what was observed in that film is that the water surface is curved and that clearly indicates curvature of the Earth.
  4. Subscriber FreakyKBH
    Acquired Taste...
    11 May '18 17:07
    Originally posted by @humy
    No, and that would make no sense for a lazar beem anyway.
    Particles that scatter light (such as fog particles) wouldn't just scatter light 'up' but sideways and down thus a scattering effect would mean the lazar beam would not be seen to stay narrow, as it did in that film, but spread out in many directions and blur over a very wide area. The same is true for ...[text shortened]... bserved in that film is that the water surface is curved thus indicating curvature of the Earth.
    "Light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation."
  5. 11 May '18 17:08
    Originally posted by @freakykbh
    "Light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation."
    what about it?
  6. 11 May '18 18:23
    Originally posted by @sonhouse
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVa2UmgdTM4

    Sorry Freaky, this nails it even for you.
    Spherical right? Not round. This isn't exactly a novel finding, the ancient greeks figured this out using a stick.
  7. Subscriber sonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    11 May '18 19:28 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by @wildgrass
    Spherical right? Not round. This isn't exactly a novel finding, the ancient greeks figured this out using a stick.
    I know, I was baiting Freaky. He is a card carrying flatearther. I also knew he would be putting forth the argument that somehow the laser would shoot upwards.
    Which is funny, how the laser would shoot upwards but the boat, not so much
  8. Subscriber FreakyKBH
    Acquired Taste...
    12 May '18 09:03
    Originally posted by @humy
    what about it?
    The first word.
  9. 12 May '18 10:32
    Originally posted by @freakykbh
    The first word.
    what about "light"?
  10. Subscriber FreakyKBH
    Acquired Taste...
    12 May '18 10:44
    Originally posted by @humy
    what about "light"?
    Think: "Beckham."
  11. 12 May '18 12:50
    Originally posted by @freakykbh
    Think: "Beckham."
    what about "Beckham"?
  12. Subscriber FreakyKBH
    Acquired Taste...
    12 May '18 16:18
    Originally posted by @humy
    what about "Beckham"?
    Bend it like him.
  13. 12 May '18 16:52
    Originally posted by @freakykbh
    Bend it like him.
    You make no sense.
  14. Subscriber FreakyKBH
    Acquired Taste...
    12 May '18 17:13
    Originally posted by @humy
    You make no sense.
    Have you been following the conversation in the thread?
    Light bends.
  15. Subscriber sonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    12 May '18 17:44 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by @freakykbh
    Have you been following the conversation in the thread?
    Light bends.
    Ah, you mean you now know why you see those buildings across the lake?

    So what is happening optically when light bends?