Originally posted by FMF Why does inserting a USB plug into an unsighted USB socket defy the law of averages? The first attempt to put the USB plug in is almost always thwarted by the end being the wrong way up.
Your need for new glasses have nothing to do with the law of averages. Just make sure the USB symbol is up.
Originally posted by RJHinds That would would depend on the orientation of the USB slot on your brand of computer. Some computers have USB slots turned sideways.
I am not going to have trouble with you am I Hinds? 🙂
Originally posted by RJHinds That would would depend on the orientation of the USB slot on your brand of computer. Some computers have USB slots turned sideways.
Actually, my unimpeachable, mental-calculation-driven and therefore empirical-after-a-fashion findings that the law of averages does not apply to plugging in a USB cable are based on me charging my phone next to my bed in the dark. Same thing almost every time: reach for the cable, plug one end of it into the phone [where I get a more or less 50-50 success rate; evidence of this is the fact that I have mentioned this 'more or less 50-50 success rate' to my wife several times, and she can testify to this], then take the other end [standard USB type] and plug it into the little electric adaptor plug thing [black, and even more so in the pitch black] with a USB socket, ...'Oops, wrong way round [or up], try again'. Again, again and again. To actually research this obvious repeal of the law of averages would just shed the situation of its mystery.
Originally posted by FMF Actually, my unimpeachable, mental-calculation-driven and therefore empirical-after-a-fashion findings that the law of averages does not apply to plugging in a USB cable are based on me charging my phone next to my bed in the dark. Same thing almost every time: reach for the cable, plug one end of it into the phone [where I get a more or less 50-50 success rate; ...[text shortened]... rch this obvious repeal of the law of averages would just shed the situation of its mystery.
If you were to have a coin made with a USB symbol on one side and perhaps an engraving of your RHP avatar (googly eyes and all) on the other, and did a coin toss in the dark, would you say it would be 50 50 heads to USB?
Originally posted by FMF To actually research this obvious repeal of the law of averages would just shed the situation of its mystery.
Another large piece of the psychological effect behind it all. People often believe there is a violation of probability because they want there to be a violation - its more exciting that way. Its exciting because we have evolved to be good at detecting patterns (and violations of patters, which is a pattern in itself) and our brains have a reward system that rewards us when we detect a pattern. For example there is a release of dopamine in your brain every time you spot a strawman on this forum and this keeps you coming back for more.
Originally posted by twhitehead Another large piece of the psychological effect behind it all. People often believe there is a violation of probability because they want there to be a violation - its more exciting that way. Its exciting because we have evolved to be good at detecting patterns (and violations of patters, which is a pattern in itself) and our brains have a reward system t ...[text shortened]... your brain every time you spot a strawman on this forum and this keeps you coming back for more.
Why do you keep using that word evolved? Why don't you say changed or improved or adapted or some other word? Nobody has evolved through evilution.
Originally posted by RJHinds Why do you keep using that word evolved? Why don't you say changed or improved or adapted or some other word? Nobody has evolved through evilution.
Originally posted by RJHinds Why do you keep using that word evolved? Why don't you say changed or improved or adapted or some other word? Nobody has evolved through evilution.
I can use any word I like. I can also use any definition for any word I like. I am not constrained to using your definition or even your spelling. And by my definition, people evolved and evolve with every birth or death. Its a fact of life.
Originally posted by twhitehead I can use any word I like. I can also use any definition for any word I like. I am not constrained to using your definition or even your spelling. And by my definition, people evolved and evolve with every birth or death. Its a fact of life.
This must be why so many people still say they believe in Evilution. They don't know what is the true meaning so they use their own meaning or the meaning they have been indoctrinated under.
Originally posted by RJHinds This must be why so many people still say they believe in Evilution. They don't know what is the true meaning so they use their own meaning or the meaning they have been indoctrinated under.
Words do not have 'true meanings'. English was invented not discovered. You've been reading too many fairy tales.
Law of Averages
23 Apr '13 04:06
Back to Top