Go back
Law of Averages

Law of Averages

Science

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
Hey, just keep hanging on to your dream, which is what it is. Just remember, human sciences are in their infancy, we are up to maybe an 8 year old level in understanding of the universe so have fun dissing an 8 year old. In another 100 years science will be more like a 12 year old and you won't have so much to stand on by then. Of course you and 99% of all ...[text shortened]... t get converted each year so eventually all your objections will fade into the bad dream it is.
"Human sciences are in their infancy, we are up to maybe an 8 year old level in understanding of the universe. In another 100 years science will be more like a 12 year old."

That sound like a slow process to me. Why not study THE BOOK and get a PHD in a year? 😏

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
"Human sciences are in their infancy, we are up to maybe an 8 year old level in understanding of the universe. In another 100 years science will be more like a 12 year old."

That sound like a slow process to me. Why not study THE BOOK and get a PHD in a year? 😏
I'll take my chances in the real world, I have no need for biblical snake oil salesmen invisible friend fantasy rides.

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
I'll take my chances in the real world, I have no need for biblical snake oil salesmen invisible friend fantasy rides.
Biblical snake oil salesmen?
Invisible friend fantasy rides?

You are sounding snooty today.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
"Human sciences are in their infancy, we are up to maybe an 8 year old level in understanding of the universe. In another 100 years science will be more like a 12 year old."

That sound like a slow process to me. Why not study THE BOOK and get a PHD in a year? 😏
For a PhD you need to do some original research. Reading a tatty book of fairy tales doesn't count.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Kepler
For a PhD you need to do some original research. Reading a tatty book of fairy tales doesn't count.
That would be original research for him. 😏

Vote Up
Vote Down

This thread's become another RJHinds trainwreck.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Kepler
For a PhD you need to do some original research. Reading a tatty book of fairy tales doesn't count.
You don't ever wish to consider the opinions of those that have done original research and gained a PhD, if those opinions disagrees with your own ideologies and beliefs.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
You don't ever wish to consider the opinions of those that have done original research and gained a PhD, if those opinions disagrees with your own ideologies and beliefs.
Really? Why would l consider your opinions then?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Kepler
Really? Why would l consider your opinions then?
You probably will not. However, there may be someone on here that wants to learn something from...

The Instructor

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
You probably will not. However, there may be someone on here that wants to learn something from...

The Instructor
I find that about as likely as your own personal version of god existing. Zero.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Why does inserting a USB plug into an unsighted USB socket defy the law of averages? The first attempt to put the USB plug in is almost always thwarted by the end being the wrong way up.
the usb symbol on the device shows how you must plug it in. as long as you remember that, you don't need to fidget.