18 Dec '09 16:08>
http://www.physorg.com/news180264793.html
It has been 13 years since the original analysis suggested they could not determine if the nanomagnetite crystals were evidence of life based activity, the same thing on earth is considered solid evidence of fossil life. This new work uses techniques unavailable way back in '96 and has, if confirmed, falsified the hypothesis that the magnetite was formed by the thermal decomposition of carbonates, the only leading non-life process known to produce such features. By falsifying that hypothesis, the only other hypothesis is biologic! So now the ball is in the court of the non-life dudes to fix their theories, otherwise the evidence will lean bigtime towards biological processes.
It has been 13 years since the original analysis suggested they could not determine if the nanomagnetite crystals were evidence of life based activity, the same thing on earth is considered solid evidence of fossil life. This new work uses techniques unavailable way back in '96 and has, if confirmed, falsified the hypothesis that the magnetite was formed by the thermal decomposition of carbonates, the only leading non-life process known to produce such features. By falsifying that hypothesis, the only other hypothesis is biologic! So now the ball is in the court of the non-life dudes to fix their theories, otherwise the evidence will lean bigtime towards biological processes.