1. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    08 Dec '13 13:49
    Originally posted by googlefudge
    Assuming similar density then you would expect it to have 11 times the volume or appx 2.22 times the radius.

    You can get all the details from the pre-publication article here

    http://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.1265v1.pdf
    Yeah, I just stuck my finger in the air and did an estimate. Even 2.2 X jupiter makes it about 300,000 km wide. A giant by any means.
  2. Joined
    31 May '06
    Moves
    1795
    09 Dec '13 15:09
    For those who want a less technical version of the story that's still reliable.

    Phil Plait "Bad Astronomer" just bogged about it.

    http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2013/12/09/exoplanet_direct_photo_of_a_planet_challenges_formation_theories.html
  3. Standard memberadam warlock
    Baby Gauss
    Ceres
    Joined
    14 Oct '06
    Moves
    18375
    09 Dec '13 16:21
    Originally posted by googlefudge
    And now I have just done more research, and am better informed than the actual 'journalist' who wrote the article in the op. Who is a clueless moron who shouldn't be writing about science stories they clearly don't understand.
    It does occur pretty often.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree