24 Jul '15 14:14>
http://phys.org/news/2015-07-mini-ice-age-hoopla-giant.html
Originally posted by Metal BrainTime will tell and I hope they are right, that it is business as usual. The fact we are in the 6th major extinction event tends to tell me they are wrong. Mankind is killing the environment one way or the other.
No you don't.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/02/13/peer-reviewed-survey-finds-majority-of-scientists-skeptical-of-global-warming-crisis/
Originally posted by sonhouseLook at this long term graph of ocean level rise. Notice the slow and consistent rise without much increase during the time CO2 increased a lot. There is no significant correlation of a rapid increase of ocean levels along with increased CO2 levels. It is simply not there.
Time will tell and I hope they are right, that it is business as usual. The fact we are in the 6th major extinction event tends to tell me they are wrong. Mankind is killing the environment one way or the other.
Oh no, another set of morons giving predictions:
http://phys.org/news/2015-07-paper-prominent-scientists-ocean-faster.html
Yet more moroni ...[text shortened]... html
And look at this idiot:
http://ecowatch.com/2015/07/23/mayor-epiphany-climate-change/
Originally posted by sonhouse"The fact we are in the 6th major extinction event tends to tell me they are wrong. Mankind is killing the environment one way or the other."
Time will tell and I hope they are right, that it is business as usual. The fact we are in the 6th major extinction event tends to tell me they are wrong. Mankind is killing the environment one way or the other.
Oh no, another set of morons giving predictions:
http://phys.org/news/2015-07-paper-prominent-scientists-ocean-faster.html
Yet more moroni ...[text shortened]... html
And look at this idiot:
http://ecowatch.com/2015/07/23/mayor-epiphany-climate-change/
Originally posted by Metal Brainso, because some animals have gone extinct not because of climate change, no animal could go or could have gone extinct as a result of climate change? Are you that stupid?
The Dodo Bird did not go extinct because of climate change and neither did the Tasmanian Tiger. .
Originally posted by humy"so, because some animals have gone extinct not because of climate change, no animal could go or could have gone extinct as a result of climate change? Are you that stupid?"
so, because some animals have gone extinct not because of climate change, no animal could go or could have gone extinct as a result of climate change? Are you that stupid?
Please tell us all; where is the contradiction in having BOTH some animals gone extinct NOT as a result of climate change AND some other animals ( [i]not ...[text shortened]... drought. Therefore, a climate change that increases the incidence of drought can kill them off.
Originally posted by Metal BrainHere is a study about those coral reefs that can recover, but notice there are still going to be vast fields of reefs that die off and the recovery will be much less than the original populations:
"so, because some animals have gone extinct not because of climate change, no animal could go or could have gone extinct as a result of climate change? Are you that stupid?"
Did I say that? No, I did not say that.
You have not established that the drought was caused by climate change. Weather is different than climate change. You keep mixing the t ...[text shortened]... rible source of information! I have already exposed them for asserting outright lies. Try again.
Originally posted by sonhouseCoral reefs are not bleaching because of global warming. Bleaching is caused by seasonal temp changes and La nina. Furthermore, natural climate change has caused mass dying of coral reefs in the distant past. Ice ages are a much greater threat to coral reefs.
Here is a study about those coral reefs that can recover, but notice there are still going to be vast fields of reefs that die off and the recovery will be much less than the original populations:
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jan/14/scientists-reveal-coral-reefs-can-survive-global-warming-great-barrier-reef
Here is an assessment of the ...[text shortened]... in the upper midwest where coral reefs are thousands of miles away, why should you give a shyte.
Originally posted by Metal BrainThis report shows a direct link between CO2 in the atmosphere and change in Ph in the oceans. They call it 'acidification' or something like that, more acid. Actually, acid starts at 7 on down, so it is really less basic, basic starts at 7 and up. There is already damage to coral reefs due to this effect:
Coral reefs are not bleaching because of global warming. Bleaching is caused by seasonal temp changes and La nina. Furthermore, natural climate change has caused mass dying of coral reefs in the distant past. Ice ages are a much greater threat to coral reefs.
http://theinconvenientskeptic.com/2010/10/coral-bleaching-what-about-the-coral-reefs-part-2-of-3/
The truth is that global warming will actually be beneficial to coral reefs. Try again.
Originally posted by sonhouseCorrect, less basic. It isn't a problem. Your link does not say it is or was, it merely implies it will. This is just another scare tactic with no basis in reality. Your link even pushes that myth about coral bleaching. Global warming is not causing coral to bleach. Seasonal water temperature changes are enough to cause that. It is normal.
This report shows a direct link between CO2 in the atmosphere and change in Ph in the oceans. They call it 'acidification' or something like that, more acid. Actually, acid starts at 7 on down, so it is really less basic, basic starts at 7 and up. There is already damage to coral reefs due to this effect:
http://www.teachoceanscience.net/teaching_resourc ...[text shortened]... e idiots back in the day, the world would be a much better place now'. When it is much too late.