1. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    26 Jan '19 17:14
    https://spaceflightnow.com/2019/01/25/ultima-thule-revealed-in-new-detail-with-fresh-flyby-image/

    I wonder if we can calculate a range of physical force needed to separate the two lobes (not that that would ever happen but just an interesting physics problem) if there was not some kind of rock welding going on where the two bodies are just basically touching and not melted together since it seems the collision was very gentle.
  2. Joined
    20 Oct '06
    Moves
    9549
    27 Jan '19 15:26
    @sonhouse said
    https://spaceflightnow.com/2019/01/25/ultima-thule-revealed-in-new-detail-with-fresh-flyby-image/

    I wonder if we can calculate a range of physical force needed to separate the two lobes (not that that would ever happen but just an interesting physics problem) if there was not some kind of rock welding going on where the two bodies are just basically touching and not melted together since it seems the collision was very gentle.
    So it's not an eggplant?
  3. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    27 Jan '19 15:39
    @wildgrass

    And so far, no green cheese
  4. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    10 Dec '06
    Moves
    8528
    27 Jan '19 18:14
    @sonhouse
    In the case where they are not fused and the system has no angular momentum which is believed to be the case from your article. You must overcome the force of gravitation. Your going to need to know the average density (assuming its pretty uniform).
  5. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    27 Jan '19 18:54
    @joe-shmo said
    @sonhouse
    In the case where they are not fused and the system has no angular momentum which is believed to be the case from your article. You must overcome the force of gravitation. Your going to need to know the average density (assuming its pretty uniform).
    We could make some assumptions like the rocks of Ultima have the same density as say limestone or granite which I would have to gargle to find those numbers😉
    Then the size, or total volume and thus the mass of each one. Can't be all that much, My guess is you could pry the two pieces apart with a crowbar.....
  6. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    10 Dec '06
    Moves
    8528
    27 Jan '19 20:31
    @sonhouse

    It would be that, a guess. We don't know what the core is, maybe solid iron, maybe loose rocks and dust. But the article gives all the other necessary measures.

    The lobes are approximately spherical.
    The longest dimension is about 21 miles.
    The larger lobe is about 2.6 time the volume of the smaller lobe.

    Those and the density are all we need to come up with an approximation.
  7. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    28 Jan '19 16:28
    @joe-shmo said
    @sonhouse

    It would be that, a guess. We don't know what the core is, maybe solid iron, maybe loose rocks and dust. But the article gives all the other necessary measures.

    The lobes are approximately spherical.
    The longest dimension is about 21 miles.
    The larger lobe is about 2.6 time the volume of the smaller lobe.

    Those and the density are all we need to come up with an approximation.
    It's too bad the probe flew by 4000 miles way from Thule, if it had gone say 10 miles from the surface, you could track the change in orbital directions to calculate the mass directly but I don't think they have much of a handle on the mass of this contact binary. At 4000 miles from a body only 10 or 20 miles across I would imagine you would have to have a micrometer to measure the change in trajectory of the probe😉
  8. Joined
    20 Oct '06
    Moves
    9549
    28 Jan '19 20:52
    @sonhouse said
    It's too bad the probe flew by 4000 miles way from Thule, if it had gone say 10 miles from the surface, you could track the change in orbital directions to calculate the mass directly but I don't think they have much of a handle on the mass of this contact binary. At 4000 miles from a body only 10 or 20 miles across I would imagine you would have to have a micrometer to measure the change in trajectory of the probe😉
    Will this thing still be transmitting when it goes interstellar? Why haven't we launched 100 of these?
  9. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    29 Jan '19 02:20
    @wildgrass said
    Will this thing still be transmitting when it goes interstellar? Why haven't we launched 100 of these?
    Maybe the one billion dollar price tag has something to do with it. That and the lucky alignment of planets that allowed that journey. I guess though that kind of trajectory can be calculated well in advance for just about any destination on the edge of the solar system though. It certainly will go interstellar but when is another question. At that distance, the bit rate right now is only one kilobit per second, pretty dam good for 4 billion miles away but at 40 billion miles, if it is still transmitting, it would probably be down to 10 bits per second if it could be tracked AND last that long at all.
  10. Joined
    20 Oct '06
    Moves
    9549
    29 Jan '19 15:141 edit
    @sonhouse said
    Maybe the one billion dollar price tag has something to do with it. That and the lucky alignment of planets that allowed that journey. I guess though that kind of trajectory can be calculated well in advance for just about any destination on the edge of the solar system though. It certainly will go interstellar but when is another question. At that distance, the bit rate r ...[text shortened]... g, it would probably be down to 10 bits per second if it could be tracked AND last that long at all.
    I assume it runs on solar power? So that'll run out eventually.

    A billion is chump change for politicians. Maybe we launch 1 per year, aim them at nearby solar systems, and in 100 years or so we will know what's what.

    edit: It's called Project Longshot - and if we launched it back in 1975 it would be halfway there by now.
  11. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    29 Jan '19 16:37
    @wildgrass

    It might be chump change for politicians but NASA has a fixed budget. It can't just ask Trump for a 50 billion extra this year, much as they would love to...

    I heard on some show that Elon Musk has a proposal for tiny solar sail chips that could reach 20% of the speed of light and launched by the hundreds, chips the size of postage stamps with a small solar sail powered by massive lasers.
    So far a pie in the sky thing because the amount of laser power needed would be in the gigawatt region and I don't think that is going to happen any time soon but the concept is valid. Aimed at Alpha Centauri, getting there in about 20 years and then beaming images and such back to Earth which would get here 4 odd years later, say 26 years for the whole thing and we would have closeups of that trinary system, three stars for the price of one. There might even be inhabitable planets around one of those stars. News at 11.
  12. Joined
    20 Oct '06
    Moves
    9549
    29 Jan '19 18:31
    @sonhouse said
    @wildgrass

    It might be chump change for politicians but NASA has a fixed budget. It can't just ask Trump for a 50 billion extra this year, much as they would love to...

    I heard on some show that Elon Musk has a proposal for tiny solar sail chips that could reach 20% of the speed of light and launched by the hundreds, chips the size of postage stamps with a small solar ...[text shortened]... or the price of one. There might even be inhabitable planets around one of those stars. News at 11.
    If it was called a "military laser-beam space force" it'd stand a decent chance of funding....
  13. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    29 Jan '19 19:58
    @wildgrass

    THAT would not surprise me a bit😉

    Here is the digital response to the 'space force'....... Single digit.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree