Originally posted by sonhousea few doubts, a few doubts, it is to laugh, the whole process is flawed, from the very inception that life could originate and organise itself from amino acids in a conveniently reducing primitive atmosphere from, I love the scientific term for this, 'the organic soup', anyone for organic soup and bread?... through the vast diversity that we see, the fossil record itself, the case for mutations, the case for transmutation of one species to another, the case for the uniqueness or otherwise of humans, take anyone of these and counter arguments can be produced which convincingly nullify any semblance of a outer Mongolian remote nano chance that life was the product of a seemingly unintelligent 'act' and evolved of its own accord, i do not expect you to agree nor accept this, for this is a personal belief, based you will notice not on gut feeling as you have erroneously asserted, but on my evaluation of the science.
So we are just supposed to fall over and play dead over just someone doubts evolution with nothing more than it looks like intelligent design to me? You do realize that is all you have, just gut reactions, no evidence other than a few biologists who go against the grain. But you like that kind of thing, don't you? If we have figured out that light is the sp ...[text shortened]... ong, we'll just have to disregard 200 years of evidence and fall over and worship the lord'?
I do not mean to be rude, honestly i do not, but i had hoped that this would not descend into an evolution v creationism argument, there is enough of that in the spirituality forum, and i have had quite enough of that already. so i will say no more on the subject, it was fun at first but i feel it getting a little more sinister, and i will take my leave, good night to all - regards robbie.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhy do you insist on grouping the origin of life with evolution? The origin of life problem is not addressed by evolution, only what happened to it after it got started. The origin of life is still an ongoing research subject. What if it turns out your designer only set up the conditions to allow life, like starting the process that begat our universe and no more interference since then? What then of all religions? That is where the origin of life issue is right now, up for grabs. It is a totally different subject separate from evolution.
a few doubts, a few doubts, it is to laugh, the whole process is flawed, from the very inception that life could originate and organise itself from amino acids in a conveniently reducing primitive atmosphere from, I love the scientific term for this, 'the organic soup', anyone for organic soup and bread?... through the vast diversity that we see, the ...[text shortened]... etting a little more sinister, and i will take my leave, good night to all - regards robbie.
2 edits
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIsaac Newton lived in a time when being religious was the norm, also science in general was barely developed compared to current times. But I would not hesistate to call myself much smarter than anyone who believes in intelligent design in modern times, especially if they are educated and had the oppurtunity to learn critical thinking.
what you mean like the stupid old professor of biochemistry, yeah that's real dumb that is????? Issac Newton, according to your statement would also constitute a dumbass as would many other extremely brilliant persons who just have not limited there search to unintelligent causes, feeling vindicated now? Perhaps you would like a list of exceptional ...[text shortened]... icular order, just leave it there and hope that like matter, it organises itself, wish me well.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI think I saw a fundamentalist creationist in one of the picuters. A very own kind of creature...
perhaps you guys may be interested in this, its a new line of stamps called mythical creatures, perhaps you could petition the post office to have them adopt your intermediary species also 😉
http://www.norvic-philatelics.co.uk/2009/06a-mythical_creatures.htm
Originally posted by FabianFnasyes its almost as bad as those atheists who visit the spirituality forum and proceed to invoke their prejudices, when in Biblical terms, they cannot tell the difference between their bum and their elbow.
Oh no, not another one thinking he's dead right about everything, yet don't know anything about the basics of evolution...
Originally posted by robbie carrobie...as their fundamentalist counterpart who litter the Science Forum with their anti-science beliefs.
yes its almost as bad as those atheists who visit the spirituality forum and proceed to invoke their prejudices, when in Biblical terms, they cannot tell the difference between their bum and their elbow.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou didn't answer my question, why you group evolution and origin of life in the same set? You do realize they are separate issues in the scientific community don't you? Also, it wasn't the 'organic soup', it was the 'primordial soup'. You really should get your recipes right🙂
lol, gentlemen i can hardly type for giggling, when i compose myself you are all toast!