Originally posted by joe shmo
And yet it happened.
Was the building to be demolished? I don't know the history of it. Could it have been ready to be knocked down?
Just extemporizing here. So if it was by some co-incidence to be knocked down, and charges in place, could the resultant explosions of the two jets have initiated an explosion in that building?
Here is a site debunking the 7 collapse:
Conspiracy theorists hang the whole tale on the word 'Pull' which actually meant, get everyone out of the building, it's moving around' not
pull it down. It didn't have to be pulled down. You can see the damage on the one side. Demolition didn't do that.
My take on conspiracy theorists, like the alien theorists, the moon landing hoaxes, 911 and such, these theories are their religion, they need conspiracies like Jews need Genesis, like Muslim's need Mohammed. These theories are their lifeline to the world. So there will ALWAYS be conspiracy theorists for most any event, any assassination, any man made disaster. Like the moon landing hoaxes, even if say, 100 years from now, tourists line up outside the Apollo footprints, there will be nutters claiming those footprints, those tire tracks, were all put their much later to keep up the deception.
There will never be an end to moon hoaxers because that is their religion.