Originally posted by humy
This is from a man that, unlike me and most of us here, doesn't know the first thing about real science let alone computer models thus obviously doesn't know in the slightest what he is talking about. All he does is constantly shout ignorant arrogant infantile assertions (not 'arguments' ) at us scientists, that know a LOT more about it than he will ever do, im ...[text shortened]... ll the time thus making it clear to everyone reading his posts what kind of person he really is.
Ridiculous. You know nothing about computer models and you prove that. Computer models have failed miserably time and time again and that is a FACT! You do not like being confused by facts so you arrogantly try to speak for the entire forum which is extremely stupid and transparent.
Science is not a trend. You need to prove your assertions without false beliefs from the political spectrum. You have not done that. You are not a climate scientist and you know nearly nothing about the science that unlike you they know a lot about.
You are engaging in "group think" which is blinding you to the facts you should be considering in an unbiased way. You are constantly ignoring the facts you do not want to consider and embracing the few facts that do not make your case at all. Breaking heat records does not prove man is the "primary cause" of global warming and cherry picking one or two predictions that come close does not fairly represent the countless number of failures of computer models you choose to ignore. That is not good science.
You are a clearly a person who has his mind made up and does not want to be confused with facts.