Science Forum

Science Forum

  1. Standard membersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52874
    16 Mar '15 13:37
    http://phys.org/news/2015-03-hydrogen-bond.html#ajTabs
  2. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    17 Mar '15 08:15
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    http://phys.org/news/2015-03-hydrogen-bond.html#ajTabs
    Okay, I understand that they have discovered a new bond, that's clear.
    But do they know why this bond exists? And how it works?
  3. Standard membersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52874
    17 Mar '15 10:25
    Originally posted by FabianFnas
    Okay, I understand that they have discovered a new bond, that's clear.
    But do they know why this bond exists? And how it works?
    I think it's a bit early for that kind of analysis. A lot of chemical bonds are not understood fully but they can still use them in medical and industrial applications.
  4. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    17 Mar '15 10:36
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    I think it's a bit early for that kind of analysis. A lot of chemical bonds are not understood fully but they can still use them in medical and industrial applications.
    So they just discovered a new kind of bond. But they don't understand it.
    Ok, got it.
  5. Standard membersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52874
    17 Mar '15 10:451 edit
    Originally posted by FabianFnas
    So they just discovered a new kind of bond. But they don't understand it.
    Ok, got it.
    I think that is the case for now. It is a very new discovery and I'm sure a number of papers will be written about it in short order, news at 11🙂

    If you think about it, you can see if a positive tries to get close to another positive, they repel. So there must be a mitigating factor, say a difference in the size of the two charges where there is a plus-plus but one plus is slightly less positive effectively than the other. I am just throwing out my thoughts on the subject, I could be totally wrong.
Back to Top