Originally posted by @whodey
How about the free thinker who suggested the theory of plate tectonics?
How about the fate of the man who suggested ulcers were a result of bacterial invasion?
How about how any scientist is treated for deviating from the status quo?
Assuming that such theories can be proved, they are eventually absolved and revered, but the initial insult can be ...[text shortened]... e establishment with open arms, all because they wish not to upset the political powers that be.
In most cases, scientists coming up with groundbreaking new theories already have permanent faculty positions. Their prestige may be at stake, but their careers aren't.
Einstein most certainly did not add the cosmological constant (to which you refer) in order to appease "the status quo." By the time Einstein introduced general relativity (which also introduced the cosmological constant), 12 years after his landmark paper on special relativity, Einstein was already one of the (if not
the) world's leading theoretical physicists. To suggest that he was afraid of what his colleagues might think is nothing short of idiotic. Interestingly, modern cosmological theories do include a cosmological constant to attempt to explain the increasing rate of expansion of the Universe.
As usual, you know nothing of the topic at hand and, with the gullibility of a feeble-minded child, swallow the analysis of propaganda rags, while arrogantly dismissing people working in the field who could actually teach you about the way science works.