Originally posted by twhitehead
I know. I was originally responding to sonhouse's comment with regards to artificial light.
[b]And when you say 'we wouldn't have spotted surface lights' on Pluto [or it's moons] that really depends
on how many we are talking about.
The same as are on Earth perhaps? We might see something in spectra, but we would not have noticed a pattern as c ...[text shortened]... pite being highly reflective in parts is still much dimmer than Earth at night. Is that correct?[/b]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_energy_budget
Earth's internal heat and other small effects
The geothermal heat flux from the Earth's interior is estimated to be 47 terawatts.[7] This comes to 0.087 watt/square metre, which represents only 0.027% of Earth's total energy budget at the surface, which is dominated by 173,000 terawatts of incoming solar radiation.[8]
There are other minor sources of energy that are usually ignored in these calculations: accretion of interplanetary dust and solar wind, light from distant stars, the thermal radiation of space. Although these are now known to be negligibly small, this was not always obvious: Joseph Fourier initially thought radiation from deep space was significant when he discussed the Earth's energy budget in a paper often cited as the first on the greenhouse effect
If we just take the geothermal heat flux and ignore the solar completely.
And then assume that only 1% of that heat flux is radiating from Earth's dark/night side in IR.
Then Earth is emitting 470 MW thermal IR on it's night side. Which is ~1~2 orders of magnitude larger than what I
optimistically calculated for Pluto.
Pluto orbits between ~30 and ~49 AU https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto with an albedo of 0.49 to 0.66
This means that Pluto receives between ~1/900 and ~1/2,400 times as much sunlight as the Earth and reflects roughly half of it.
Earth receives [on average] 1367W/m2 [in space] from the Sun.
Which means Pluto receives between ~1.51 and ~0.57 W/m2 solar radiation. [almost all in The Visible wave band]
This means that [using the numbers from last time] Pluto will be reflecting roughly 5.6MW to 2.1MW visible light.
[Assuming no geothermal energy remaining, the remaining energy must be re-radiated away thermally.]
Which means that Pluto must be 'glowing' in long wave with roughly 2.1~5.6MW total. Assuming a 80~20 split between the
energy emitted back towards the sun on the day light side and the energy emitted out into deep space on the night
time side. [There is no atmosphere to act as insulation and a 6.39 Earth day day length] then Pluto should be glowing
in longwave radiation with 1.7~4.5 MW. At a temperature of between 33K and 55K https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto
If we assume an Earth sized city on Pluto, with 1 million homes in it, each using ~4KW energy [which is not a lot for
people living essentially in space] then those homes are going to use ~4GW energy. Now add in all the manufacturing,
and the huge nuclear powered green houses for food production etc etc. And you are talking about 100's of GW of energy.
All of which eventually gets radiated away as heat.
A 100W incandescent light bulb emits ~5% of its energy as visible light. The remaining ~95% as IR thermal energy.
If we assume a city lit like one on Earth [for whatever reason] with over 1 million homes plus businesses and farms then
we can expect well over 1 million light bulbs. Which gives 5MW of visible light being emitted, and 95MW IR.
A large metropolitan area like New York or Tokyo on the Earth will emit WAY more.
An inhabited hemisphere [basically as long as your not over the middle of the pacific] will emit way way more than that.
So to answer the question, yes, the Earth's night side is way brighter than Pluto's day side at closest approach.
By many orders of magnitude, in both IR and Visible radiation. The visible part is almost entirely down to us.