13 Jan '14 16:44>
Originally posted by googlefudgeYou believe evilution on faith because that's all you got.
No it can't. Especially not on the science forum.
Faith is verboten in science.
Originally posted by RJHindsNo, I don't.
You believe evilution on faith because that's all you got.
Originally posted by RJHindsIt is more than a little ironic that someone like you, who places so much importance in religion, thinks that it is an insult to accuse others of a believing in a religion. You're basically arguing that the ideas of evolution are just as stupid as the ideas of creationism, which doesn't seem like a very good strategy for selling creationism.
They have been conspiring with fake evidences to try to convince people of evilution for over a hundred years now. However, most of their false science has been revealed. People with common sense are not fooled by their nonsense about billions and millions of years of past history. Yes, evilution is a religion.
Originally posted by SoothfastIt is unlikely that our basic assumptions won't be discredited? I think every generation believes that what they know is correct, but most generations have been proven wrong. Of course they died believing that they had it figured out, so I suppose ignorance is bliss.
It is improbable that the data will be "corrected" by fifty or a hundred standard deviations, which is about as likely as falling off a toilet in Kentucky and landing in the Eye of Jupiter.
Originally posted by EladarYou mean we are wrong about it being improbable to fall off a toilet in Kentucky and landing in the Eye of Jupiter?
It is unlikely that our basic assumptions won't be discredited? I think every generation believes that what they know is correct, but most generations have been proven wrong. Of course they died believing that they had it figured out, so I suppose ignorance is bliss.
Originally posted by EladarGo read "The Relativity of Wrong" By Isaac Asimov and get spanked by the master.
It is unlikely that our basic assumptions won't be discredited? I think every generation believes that what they know is correct, but most generations have been proven wrong. Of course they died believing that they had it figured out, so I suppose ignorance is bliss.
Originally posted by googlefudgePerhaps the best way to expose of the idiocy of this common line of reasoning by the Creationists is to refer to hypotheses that can only be right or wrong with little room for a grey area between and which where wrongly assumed to be wrong or right in the past but now we know better and then point out to the creationists that, according to THEIR stupid logic here, all those hypotheses must now be BOTH right and wrong! -which is an idiotic logical contradiction.
Go read "The Relativity of Wrong" By Isaac Asimov and get spanked by the master.
http://chem.tufts.edu/answersinscience/relativityofwrong.htm
We are currently wrong about the shape of the Earth... but not so wrong that
we can't rule out it being a cube.
Originally posted by googlefudgeI'm sure I'd get smacked by the master of any generation, at least in the eyes of those who disagree with me.
Go read "The Relativity of Wrong" By Isaac Asimov and get spanked by the master.
http://chem.tufts.edu/answersinscience/relativityofwrong.htm
We are currently wrong about the shape of the Earth... but not so wrong that
we can't rule out it being a cube.
Originally posted by humyThe basic problem is that some believe that certain unproved assumptions are more correct than others.
Perhaps the best way to expose of the idiocy of this common line of reasoning by the Creationists is to refer to hypotheses that can only be right or wrong with no grey area between and which where wrongly assumed to be wrong or right in the past but now we know better and then point out to the creationists that, according to THEIR stupid logic here, all those ...[text shortened]... turn -even the moronic Creationists must surely know just how total idiocy such a conclusion is!
Originally posted by Eladar
The basic problem is that some believe that certain unproved assumptions are more correct than others.
Does God exist? Of course the best assumptions is that God does not exist therefore we must assume that God does not exist and it really isn't an unproved assumptions anymore. It is the absolute truth because we want to believe we know absolute truth.
You guys are such shmucks.
The basic problem is that some believe that certain unproved assumptions are more correct than others.
Originally posted by EladarDon't let the door spank you on the ass on the way out...
The basic problem is that some believe that certain unproved assumptions are more correct than others.
Does God exist? Of course the best assumptions is that God does not exist therefore we must assume that God does not exist and it really isn't an unproved assumptions anymore. It is the absolute truth because we want to believe we know absolute truth.
You guys are such shmucks.
Originally posted by humyThe basic problem is that some believe that certain unproved [b]assumptionsare more correct than others.