Originally posted by RJHinds
I am still waiting for you to scientifically prove that the Shroud of Turin is a fake. Unless you can do that then it must prove the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus.
Nope.
IF.... and this is a really big IF... a test was done that proved that
the shroud, and the image on it, were made at around the time JC
was supposed to have been crucified...
Then that would prove that this was a cloth with an image on it
made at about the time JC was supposed to have been crucified.
It wouldn't prove that the image made it onto the cloth magically.
It wouldn't prove that it was a cloth wrapped around a crucifixion victim.
It wouldn't prove that if it was wrapped around a crucified person that
that person was JC. [we can't do a dna test because we haven't got a
confirmed sample of JC's dna to compare to, we have no accurate contemporary
pictures of JC to know what he looked like, and if we did, those could
have been copied... ect]
And even if it was wrapped around a real person called JC that wouldn't
prove that JC was the son of god or could perform miracles.
And it wouldn't prove that the person who was wrapped in it had come back
to life.
As ever, for a piece of evidence to be proof of something, it must have only
one possible rational explanation.
For the Shroud to be proof of the resurrection, then it must be possible to explain
it's existence ONLY by JC's resurrection.
As it is trivially easy to not only come up with alternate hypothesis, but more likely
ones, then the Shroud wouldn't even be evidence FOR the resurrection, let alone
proof. And that is assuming that it was confirmed to BE the shroud wrapped around
JC.
And you can't even show that.