Here is an excerpt from the link below:
"5. Summary and Conclusions
[22] Based on a selection of nine long, high quality tide gauge records, the mean rate of sea level rise over the period 1904–2003 was found to be 1.74 ± 0.16 mm/yr after correction for GIA using the ICE‐4G model [Peltier, 2001] and for inverse barometer effects using HadSLP2 [Allan and Ansell, 2006]. The mean rate of rise was greater in the first half of this period than the latter half, though the difference in rates was not found to be significant. The use of a reduced number of high quality sea level records was found to be as suitable in this type of analysis as using a larger number of regionally averaged gauges.
[23] Finally, in extending the work of HW04 to cover the whole century, it is found that the high decadal rates of change in global mean sea level observed during the last 20 years of the record were not particularly unusual in the longer term context."
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2006GL028492
Less than 2 mm per year on average. I think Florida is safe.
@Metal-Brain
NASA says different. Like TWICE that number.
https://www.nasa.gov/specials/sea-level-rise-2020/
Oh, wait, I forgot, you are a conspiracy troll so you won't believe anything NASA says.
That of course is YOUR problem not ours.
@metal-brain saidYou've posted this same article multiple times over. Did you know that there are lots of articles written about sea level rise, with much more comprehensive and up to date information and technology? Is there any particular reason you choose to post this one over and over?
Here is an excerpt from the link below:
"5. Summary and Conclusions
[22] Based on a selection of nine long, high quality tide gauge records, the mean rate of sea level rise over the period 1904–2003 was found to be 1.74 ± 0.16 mm/yr after correction for GIA using the ICE‐4G model [Peltier, 2001] and for inverse barometer effects using HadSLP2 [Allan and Ansell, 2006 ...[text shortened]... ey.com/doi/full/10.1029/2006GL028492
Less than 2 mm per year on average. I think Florida is safe.
A more comprehensive analysis of the data and literature should be conducted before "not alarming" would be an acceptable conclusion.
@sonhouse saidWhich years did they use to find that average?
@Metal-Brain
NASA says different. Like TWICE that number.
https://www.nasa.gov/specials/sea-level-rise-2020/
Oh, wait, I forgot, you are a conspiracy troll so you won't believe anything NASA says.
That of course is YOUR problem not ours.
Even 3.3 mm per year on average is not alarming.
@wildgrass saidAre you alarmed? Even 3 mm is not very much. I suggest you pull out a ruler and see how much of your fingernail is 3 mm. Now do you understand why ocean front property is still in high demand? The buyers are not alarmed and the banks still loan money to them so they are not alarmed either.
You've posted this same article multiple times over. Did you know that there are lots of articles written about sea level rise, with much more comprehensive and up to date information and technology? Is there any particular reason you choose to post this one over and over?
A more comprehensive analysis of the data and literature should be conducted before "not alarming" would be an acceptable conclusion.
Feel free to post a recent peer reviewed article.
@metal-brain saidWe've been through many long threads on this subject, with appropriate references. You are welcome to review those. Your assertion of 'not alarming' was not a scientific statement, was not even used in the article you posted, nor is it justified by data in the article you posted.
Are you alarmed? Even 3 mm is not very much. I suggest you pull out a ruler and see how much of your fingernail is 3 mm. Now do you understand why ocean front property is still in high demand? The buyers are not alarmed and the banks still loan money to them so they are not alarmed either.
Feel free to post a recent peer reviewed article.
@wildgrass saidOcean front property is still in high demand. Are people foolish for buying it or not? Yes or no?
We've been through many long threads on this subject, with appropriate references. You are welcome to review those. Your assertion of 'not alarming' was not a scientific statement, was not even used in the article you posted, nor is it justified by data in the article you posted.
@metal-brain saidNo.
Ocean front property is still in high demand. Are people foolish for buying it or not? Yes or no?
@metal-brain saidLOL. This is turning into a thread on spirituality, no? If we believe that climate change is fake news, then it must be.
Then there is nothing alarming about sea level rise.
@wildgrass saidWhere is your peer reviewed science article to prove your case?
LOL. This is turning into a thread on spirituality, no? If we believe that climate change is fake news, then it must be.
It is fake news and the motive is a carbon tax. Money is a powerful motive.
Most of the people that are pushing a carbon tax are flying on carbon emitting jets and support increasing military spending, the main carbon emitters. BTW, all the carbon tax proposals exempt the military and big oil started the global warming movement. Maurice Strong and the Rockefellers started it all.
If it isn't propaganda why no mention of the blatant hypocrisy? Why did the big oil tycoons start something that is supposedly against their own interests? Every AGW alarmist has a conspiracy theory regarding big oil, yet it is completely backwards. Big oil started the whole thing.
@metal-brain saidRead all the other threads you started on the same subject. All these arguments (especially the weird conspiracy ones) were completely dismantled.
Where is your peer reviewed science article to prove your case?
It is fake news and the motive is a carbon tax. Money is a powerful motive.
Most of the people that are pushing a carbon tax are flying on carbon emitting jets and support increasing military spending, the main carbon emitters. BTW, all the carbon tax proposals exempt the military and big oil started the gl ...[text shortened]... onspiracy theory regarding big oil, yet it is completely backwards. Big oil started the whole thing.
@wildgrass saidYou are lying again.
Read all the other threads you started on the same subject. All these arguments (especially the weird conspiracy ones) were completely dismantled.
I presented no conspiracy theories and you know it. You also never presented any of your own peer reviewed science articles like I did. Calling legitimate peer reviewed science articles conspiracy theories is a flat out lie and you know that.
Tell the truth for once. Losing a foolish bet does not justify lying. Get over it.
@Metal-Brain
Tell that to the coastal communities like in Alaska where an entire village is now underwater.
But hey, no big deal, right? Just a bunch of subhuman indignes, who gives a shyte about THEM, right?
@sonhouse saidThat is NOT because of sea level rise. We have been over that before.
@Metal-Brain
Tell that to the coastal communities like in Alaska where an entire village is now underwater.
But hey, no big deal, right? Just a bunch of subhuman indignes, who gives a shyte about THEM, right?