Originally posted by twhitehead
You can create a floating land mass the size of australia, but fertilizing the ocean is a problem?
I was thinking along the lines of exactly what you mention, ie ocean currents drawing nutrients from the ocean floor. We could either build current guides that cause natural currents to push nutrients to the suface (the way continents and some islands alr ...[text shortened]... y do), or we could have large tubes with pumps physically pumping ocean sediment to the surface.
I think it might be easier just to cover that ocean surface with 'floating land' and grow food on top of it. I would think that producing 'current guides' vast enough to draw-up nutrients all the way from the ocean bottom would be so expensive that the cost of that would be at least very roughly comparable to that of producing vast areas of floating land.
I neglected to mention an added benefit of having vast areas of artificial floating land; it can easily be designed to have a greater albedo than the ocean it covers
( 'easily' because oceans naturally have low albedo ) and thus cool the planet and thus can be designed to exactly counteract global warming caused by man-made CO2 emission. This would be a huge side-benefit in addition to the main purpose of the floating land which would be to provide us with much more inhabitable land.
Personally, I feel that, in the
very far future, we should leave the fish for the whales.