Go back
Spintronics closer to reality:

Spintronics closer to reality:

Science

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
07 Nov 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

https://phys.org/news/2017-11-two-dimensional-materials-path-ultra-low-power-transistors.html

h

Joined
06 Mar 12
Moves
642
Clock
07 Nov 17
1 edit

This looks promising but I have some concern that they used dichalcogenide, a material that would always be expensive. I hope they will eventually later substitute that for some much cheaper material so it can be scaled-up without costs spiraling out of control. But I am betting they can do that without too much difficulty.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
07 Nov 17

Originally posted by @humy
This looks promising but I have some concern that they used dichalcogenide, a material that would always be expensive. I hope they will eventually later substitute that for some much cheaper material so it can be scaled-up without costs spiraling out of control. But I am betting they can do that without too much difficulty.
Do you know how expensive? One of the benefits of Perovskites is, say for solar cells, is that it is much cheaper than silicon and you make cells with the stuff by roll to roll rather than a cleanroom system.

Any idea of how much this stuff costs compared to silicon? I did a google search for price but only came up with science stuff about it but no place to buy or prices. That seems to be not a good sign🙂

h

Joined
06 Mar 12
Moves
642
Clock
07 Nov 17
2 edits

Originally posted by @sonhouse
Do you know how expensive?
no, but, as far as I am aware, it normally contains several rare Earth elements so I am guessing it must generally be relatively expensive.
See
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transition_metal_dichalcogenide_monolayers
to see what I mean.

h

Joined
06 Mar 12
Moves
642
Clock
08 Nov 17
7 edits

Originally posted by @humy
no, but, as far as I am aware, it normally contains several rare Earth elements so I am guessing it must generally be relatively expensive.
See
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transition_metal_dichalcogenide_monolayers
to see what I mean.
actually, it has just occurred to me that it might not matter too much even if the material is relatively very expensive (in terms of cost per kilogram) providing the total amount used per computer (in terms of, say, micrograms per computer) is so minute that its total cost per computer is still small despite that. But not sure how little of it (per computer) you can get away with using while maintaining most of its good functional benefit. I suppose it would be used sparingly by ONLY putting it into the microcircuits themselves (it could also be put in their external wires excluding the power wires) and we all know how tiny they can be!

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
08 Nov 17

Originally posted by @humy
actually, it has just occurred to me that it might not matter too much even if the material is relatively very expensive (in terms of cost per kilogram) providing the total amount used per computer (in terms of, say, micrograms per computer) is so minute that its total cost per computer is still small despite that. But not sure how little of it (per com ...[text shortened]... be put in their external wires excluding the power wires) and we all know how tiny they can be!
Besides all that, when they come across an interesting effect, that usually spurs an effort to find cheaper subs.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.