The birthday paradox: tested in real life?

The birthday paradox: tested in real life?

Science

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Joined
31 May 06
Moves
1795
07 Nov 12

Originally posted by twhitehead
OK, here is my analysis of some data I have access to. These are flights on a chartered aircraft.
Column 1, is the number of passengers on the flight.
Column 2, is the number of flights with no double birthdays.
Column 3, is the number of flights with two double birthdays.
Column 4, is the number of flights with three double birthdays.
Column 5, is ...[text shortened]... 26 1 2
27 2 4 3
28 1 1 1
29 2 1
30 2 1
31 1
32 1
33 1
35 1 1
40 2
I think what you have there is evidence your airline is going bust...

Over 100 flights with 4 or fewer people on them.

Cape Town

Joined
14 Apr 05
Moves
52945
07 Nov 12
1 edit

Originally posted by googlefudge
I think what you have there is evidence your airline is going bust...

Over 100 flights with 4 or fewer people on them.
We are paid by the flight not by the number of passengers on board.
Also, I excluded all passengers for whom we did not have birthday information, so those flights actually had more passengers on.
I have also counted as a 'flight' a return flight, and in reality it is a different set of passengers in each direction (so only about half the numbers listed actually were on board at any given time).

The aircraft only has about 22 seats and depending on cargo and the weather it may not be able to fill them all.