The dipole repeller

Does under dense space repel collective matter?

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-016-0036

If so, does it explain the expansion of the universe? Eliminate the need for dark matter to explain why the galaxy doesn't fly apart from spinning so fast?

@metal-brain said
Does under dense space repel collective matter?

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-016-0036

If so, does it explain the expansion of the universe? Eliminate the need for dark matter to explain why the galaxy doesn't fly apart from spinning so fast?

@suzianne said
If the earth, at the equator, rotates at over 1000 miles per hour (or 460 meters per second), why don't people fly off?

Have you ever awoken from a dead sleep wondering this, MB?

(I bet you have, you can tell us.)

@Metal-Brain
And you are asking us as if we are professional astronomers? What your question really shows is your continual intellectual laziness as if just asking the question somehow puts you on a higher mental plane. All it shows is your disdain of science and your answer clearly showed your disdain of us, "TRY TO KEEP UP" as if we are in some kind of intellectual race against yourself described incredible intellect.

MOND is just a theory and there has to be more evidence to say anything with certainty about it. So look that stuff up yourself instead of asking postal workers and hardware technicians those kind of questions even though Suzianne and I in fact ARE mentally superior to the average.
We NEVER post questions like that posed as attacks. I put up what I think is an interesting to me scientific discovery which needs further research by independent investigators to prove as true. I just present some study with no political ramifications inherent in my post. Unlike you.

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
And you are asking us as if we are professional astronomers? What your question really shows is your continual intellectual laziness as if just asking the question somehow puts you on a higher mental plane. All it shows is your disdain of science and your answer clearly showed your disdain of us, "TRY TO KEEP UP" as if we are in some kind of intellectual race a ...[text shortened]... as true. I just present some study with no political ramifications inherent in my post. Unlike you.

@Metal-Brain
Well it is up to YOU to find that astrophysicist since you brough it up. It is not OUR job to have you think you are setting us up for ridicule.
if you didn't know, there are DOZENS of astrophysicists online and youtube to answer any astronomy question you have, again with the intellectual laziness, you just want us to spoon feed you information so you don't have to waste your self assured valuable time looking such things up yourself.
It also says you are not much interested in the answers, only in 'can I weaponize that answer somehow?'

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
Well it is up to YOU to find that astrophysicist since you brough it up. It is not OUR job to have you think you are setting us up for ridicule.
if you didn't know, there are DOZENS of astrophysicists online and youtube to answer any astronomy question you have, again with the intellectual laziness, you just want us to spoon feed you information so you don't ...[text shortened]... also says you are not much interested in the answers, only in 'can I weaponize that answer somehow?'

@Metal-Brain
This is EXACTLY what I am talking about. YOU are too friggin lazy to do your own research and when we call you on it, you go directly into attack mode.
Find it yourself.

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
This is EXACTLY what I am talking about. YOU are too friggin lazy to do your own research and when we call you on it, you go directly into attack mode.
Find it yourself.

@Metal-Brain
I DID answer it but you are too pig headed, er METAL headed to either understand or debate.
You don't WANT answers, you want to win talking points ALWAYS. So good luck with your so called new found love of science.

"MOND is just a theory and there has to be more evidence to say anything with certainty about it. So look that stuff up yourself instead of asking postal workers and hardware technicians those kind of questions even though Suzianne and I in fact ARE mentally superior to the average.
We NEVER post questions like that posed as attacks. I put up what I think is an interesting to me scientific discovery which needs further research by independent investigators to prove as true. I just present some study with no political ramifications inherent in my post. Unlike you."


You just automatically take some OPINION of a scientist as actual fact and no amount of either common sense or scientific rebuttal will make any difference to you since all you want is chaos, you care NOTHING about real science.

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
I DID answer it but you are too pig headed, er METAL headed to either understand or debate.
You don't WANT answers, you want to win talking points ALWAYS. So good luck with your so called new found love of science.

"MOND is just a theory and there has to be more evidence to say anything with certainty about it. So look that stuff up yourself instead of aski ...[text shortened]... al will make any difference to you since all you want is chaos, you care NOTHING about real science.

@metal-brain said
I asked if the dipole repeller is MoND theory. You did not answer my question.

@shallow-blue said
That's because the question makes no sense. The dipole repeller is one specific area in the universe. MOND theories are a variety of theories about gravity, all of them, right now, highly dubious.
Asking whether one is the other is like asking whether Birmingham is a post-Keynesian economic theory. The problem is not just that we don't have the answer, but that they're ...[text shortened]... y at all but a single observable phenomenon. 'Which is better' is simply not an applicable question.

@metal-brain said
The dipole repeller seems highly dubious to me. Gravity is not supposed to repel.
I think it is MoND theory and you make no sense.

@metal-brain said
I think