Go back
Unvaxxed deaths 98% of total now.

Unvaxxed deaths 98% of total now.

Science

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

@metal-brain said
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_vaccine
Lies, damned lies, and Metal Brain. Come on, stop pretending that Pikiwedia is on your side - even Facebook is not as pathetic as you are.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

@liljo said
I know the drill. And if you were on the other side of the door, I BET I'd kick that sob right down on top of you
Eh, come on, boy. You're too nonagenarian to kick even a pasteboard Donalod down on your own toes.

1 edit
Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1

@shallow-blue said
Lies, damned lies, and Metal Brain. Come on, stop pretending that Pikiwedia is on your side - even Facebook is not as pathetic as you are.
Development of COVID-19 vaccines utilizing gene therapy technology

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33772572/

Don't you know how to read a government website?

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

@Metal-Brain
"Is PubMed trustworthy?
The growth of PubMed Central (PMC) and public access mandates have affected PubMed's composition. The authors tested recent claims that content in PMC is of low quality and affects PubMed's reliability, while exploring PubMed's role in the current scholarly communications landscape."

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

@metal-brain said
COVID-19 vaccines utilizing gene therapy technology
Repeating a lie does not make it not a lie.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

@metal-brain said
Development of COVID-19 vaccines utilizing gene therapy technology

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33772572/

Don't you know how to read a government website?
That is a government website you morons.
Tell the government they are lying to you.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

@Metal-Brain
Oh yes Comrade, we are at your service, ready to attack when you are.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1

Flu has allegedly disappeared (it hasn't, it's largely been rebranded as Covid 19 as the PCR test can't distinguishe between the two as i will show).

Is there something going around - absolutely yes, but we haven't proven that it's what we are boing told it is (could be just incompetence or greed, who knows?). The whole exercise has been a fudge; I'm surprosed that intelligent people haven't picked up on it. Deaths are based on dying "with" covid, not of - you might as well say that people are dying with pubic hair. Anyway ..........

Here's the notes for Health Care Professionals on this super duper all singing test that it's inventor told us wasn't suitable for epidemic testing in the first place. Nobody has yet come up with a test to prove the presence of Covid Sars 2 infection.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/926410/Understanding_Cycle_Threshold__Ct__in_SARS-CoV-2_RT-PCR_.pdf

and the magic words are -

"RT-PCR detects presence of viral genetic material in a sample but is not able to
distinguish whether infectious virus is present. The quantity of intact virus in upper
respiratory swabs will be affected by factors that are endogenous and exogenous to
laboratory methods." Page 6 paragraph 1 directly after the first diagram.

According to Dr Mike Yeadon (and this big hitter is certainly not alone) the former head of respiratory medicine at Pfizer (no less, those good people that make one of the jabs) the error rate on the PCR test is 90%. You have more chance of getting this right by flipping a coin.

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@medullah
https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/clinical/clinical-genomics/pathogen-detection-solutions/accula-rapid-pcr-system.[WORD TOO LONG]

Sorry for the long link but they are refuting your claim.

Kill the period at the end of the sentence and the word too long deal and the rest works.