1. Joined
    13 Aug '08
    Moves
    538
    02 Oct '08 03:46
  2. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    02 Oct '08 09:41
    Originally posted by jacko11
    At his times? Yes.
    He was a genius!
  3. Joined
    13 Aug '08
    Moves
    538
    02 Oct '08 12:27
    wot time was that
  4. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    02 Oct '08 12:34
    Originally posted by jacko11
    wot time was that
    From Wikipedia:
    "Nicolaus Copernicus (February 19, 1473 – May 24, 1543) was the first astronomer to formulate a scientifically based heliocentric cosmology that displaced the Earth from the center of the universe. His epochal book, De revolutionibus orbium coelestium (On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres), is often regarded as the starting point of modern astronomy and the defining epiphany that began the Scientific Revolution."

    As I said, a genius.
  5. Standard memberwolfgang59
    invigorated
    Dunedin
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    45641
    02 Oct '08 15:39
    Originally posted by FabianFnas
    From Wikipedia:
    "Nicolaus Copernicus (February 19, 1473 – May 24, 1543) was the first astronomer to formulate a scientifically based heliocentric cosmology that displaced the Earth from the center of the universe. His epochal book, De revolutionibus orbium coelestium (On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres), is often regarded as the starting point o ...[text shortened]... onomy and the defining epiphany that began the Scientific Revolution."

    As I said, a genius.
    Surely Aristarchus deserves some credit? Particularly as he was working without a telescope and without the aid of years of observation?

    But most reckon Ptolemy was greater (even if he was wrong).

    The Greatest of all time? Hubble!
  6. Joined
    13 Aug '08
    Moves
    538
    03 Oct '08 01:13
    what about Galileo
  7. weedhopper
    Joined
    25 Jul '07
    Moves
    8073
    06 Oct '08 02:17
    Originally posted by jacko11
    what about Galileo
    or Kepler?
  8. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    06 Oct '08 09:06
    Let's take it from the beginning again: was nicholas capernicus the best astronomer

    No, he wasn't the best astronomer ever.
    At his time, yes. For all times, no.
  9. Joined
    13 Aug '08
    Moves
    538
    09 Oct '08 10:12
    Originally posted by FabianFnas
    Let's take it from the beginning again: [b]was nicholas capernicus the best astronomer

    No, he wasn't the best astronomer ever.
    At his time, yes. For all times, no.[/b]
    who was then
  10. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    09 Oct '08 10:231 edit
    Originally posted by jacko11
    who was then
    ...or perhaps is?

    Now when we have satellites, computers, instruments of the most sensitive kind we can all be good astronomers. But without a great mind we cannot go very far.

    I think the title "best Astronomer of all times" shuold go to someone with an extrodinary kind of mind.

    Who? I don't know, let's see what the Nobel Prize in Physics of the year of 2008 goes to. Perhaps it's him, or her?
  11. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    10 Oct '08 20:19
    Originally posted by FabianFnas
    ...or perhaps is?

    Now when we have satellites, computers, instruments of the most sensitive kind we can all be good astronomers. But without a great mind we cannot go very far.

    I think the title "best Astronomer of all times" shuold go to someone with an extrodinary kind of mind.

    Who? I don't know, let's see what the Nobel Prize in Physics of the year of 2008 goes to. Perhaps it's him, or her?
    That would be Professor Nambu from the U of Chicago, Kobayashi from Kek labs in Japan and Maskasawa from U Kyoto. Won on the properties of sub atomic particles. Nambu get the biggest portion, he is 87 years old, so it was about 30 years overdue. So not quite cosmology but more the fundamental underpinnings of particle science.
Back to Top