1. Joined
    05 May '05
    Moves
    1799
    05 Sep '05 07:08
    I personally think that the 7 day timebank is too long for the lowest timebank option.

    A three day timebank would be great.
  2. omnipresent
    Joined
    29 Oct '04
    Moves
    20009
    05 Sep '05 12:031 edit
    Originally posted by pcpp
    I personally think that the 7 day timebank is too long for the lowest timebank option.

    A three day timebank would be great.
    nm. But there's a 0-day option.
  3. Joined
    05 May '05
    Moves
    1799
    05 Sep '05 13:31
    I know theres a 0-day option, but i'm sure some users would like the security of a timebank without having to wait potentially 7 days or so for someone to move.
  4. Johannesburg
    Joined
    02 May '04
    Moves
    13019
    05 Sep '05 13:45
    Originally posted by pcpp
    I personally think that the 7 day timebank is too long for the lowest timebank option.

    A three day timebank would be great.
    Aaah, but what about a 1 day timebank, or a 5 day timeout?

    Actually I don't see why the drop-down lists for timeout/timebank should be needed at all. They place an unnecessary constraint on the site.

    Once selected, the site doesn't care whether the timebank 0,1,2,...
    If we could simply type the number of days for timeout/timebank, then other requests for another arbitrary value wouldn't appear.

    The only change should be the control used and a validation to prevent ridiculous selections such as 500 day timeout.
  5. omnipresent
    Joined
    29 Oct '04
    Moves
    20009
    05 Sep '05 15:02
    Originally posted by craigy
    Aaah, but what about a 1 day timebank, or a 5 day timeout?

    Actually I don't see why the drop-down lists for timeout/timebank should be needed at all. They place an unnecessary constraint on the site.

    Once selected, the site doesn't care whether the timebank 0,1,2,...
    If we could simply type the number of days for timeout/timebank, then other requests ...[text shortened]... d be the control used and a validation to prevent ridiculous selections such as 500 day timeout.
    now that's a good idea.
  6. Virginia
    Joined
    23 Oct '03
    Moves
    70636
    06 Sep '05 15:25
    Originally posted by craigy
    ...The only change should be the control used and a validation to prevent ridiculous selections such as 500 day timeout.
    I love this idea. Maybe just max it out at 28.
  7. Joined
    14 Jul '05
    Moves
    841
    13 Sep '05 22:55
    Originally posted by Pie1120
    I love this idea. Maybe just max it out at 28.
    yes . most exelent idea
  8. Standard memberAnwylyd
    Mandla
    Unknown
    Joined
    02 Apr '05
    Moves
    10068
    14 Sep '05 18:11
    Originally posted by spiudl
    yes . most exelent idea
    agreed
  9. Joined
    12 Aug '05
    Moves
    739
    25 Sep '05 10:09
    I believe that there there should be a 2 day time bank.
  10. Standard memberXanthosNZ
    Cancerous Bus Crash
    p^2.sin(phi)
    Joined
    06 Sep '04
    Moves
    25076
    25 Sep '05 10:28
    Originally posted by asianking
    I believe that there there should be a 2 day time bank.
    How original and innovative.
  11. Standard memberGatecrasher
    Whale watching
    33°36'S 26°53'E
    Joined
    05 Feb '04
    Moves
    41150
    25 Sep '05 14:54
    Originally posted by XanthosNZ
    How original and innovative.
    How sarcastic.😉
  12. Standard memberMIODude
    me, not you
    CaNaDa
    Joined
    25 Nov '04
    Moves
    46658
    25 Sep '05 20:45
    I'd like a 15 hours and 39 minute timebank.
Back to Top