- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
15 Mar 18
Originally posted by @marinkatombI dunno. I don't think we should give people an excuse to post games where the only annotations are [ +0.37 ]
A lot of sites have this now. It would be a great addition to RHP.
18 Mar 18
Sites like Gameknot have this feature, even for free members.
It is not automatic however, they must be requested upon completion,
although you are limited to I think 3 games a month(?)
I personally wouldn't use it, as I have an engine,
however I can see it being beneficial for many users to help them understand where they went wrong in a game.
19 Mar 18
Where they went wrong, yes, but not why. For that one needs a coach or a good book, not [+0.37] and a list of variations.
Moreover, it might prove to be too much of a temptation for some people to refer to it during ongoing games. If such a feature were added to RHP, it would have to be restricted to completed games.
I would't use an online engine feature at RHP.