06 Sep '09 05:02>
I think that there are more clans than there are leaders interested in leading them and members interested in joining them and whose membership is interested in continuing to play for them. If this is true, then it seems awkward to allow the creation of new clans endlessly, as all subs are allowed to be in four clans and be leader of one clan, an overabundance of clans is really an issue.
This has been said before and it's worth considering: NO NEW CLANS.
No new clans until the clans we have are either actively led or are populated with at least 5 members each.
The option of creating a new clan is simply halted for a time. That's all it takes.
We can have a clan exchange mode.
Some leader wants to give up leadership, some other sub can offer to take it over.
Someone is looking for a clan, fine, they can post their interest and clan leaders can invite them.
If we run out of a sufficient number of clan openings, or clans, then we can resume an open clan creation option again.
I don't see a downside.
This has been said before and it's worth considering: NO NEW CLANS.
No new clans until the clans we have are either actively led or are populated with at least 5 members each.
The option of creating a new clan is simply halted for a time. That's all it takes.
We can have a clan exchange mode.
Some leader wants to give up leadership, some other sub can offer to take it over.
Someone is looking for a clan, fine, they can post their interest and clan leaders can invite them.
If we run out of a sufficient number of clan openings, or clans, then we can resume an open clan creation option again.
I don't see a downside.