28 Mar '06 11:19>1 edit
This post is unavailable.
Please refer to our posting guidelines.
Originally posted by marinakatombAs I take such pleasure in explaining the blatantly obvious...
SO you'll be accepting a 20 v 20 challenge then? Face it, we'd shit all over your sorry lot and you know it!
EDIT: I actually took the time to open all those games you linked. It's interesting, my guys were all out rated by quite a way. What you have done is highlight exactly what i was aluding to. We won't be submitting any more teams as we can't fi ...[text shortened]... ith some more useless stats, i can see you obviously don't have anything better to do...
Originally posted by hopscotchJesus, one last time.
As I take such pleasure in explaining the blatantly obvious...
You're under par with your challenges.
You're under par with your league team.
Pick one, specialise, and build on that, Mr. Clan Leader. You can't have everything. Look at cludi's Vikings, they're a great clan! They're very competitive in the leagues. They don't concentrate too heavily lot of potential... I could tell you exactly how to run your clan if you want.
Originally posted by marinakatombAllowing people to recruit people outside of their clan for the leagues doesn't give any more team spirit or stops fluctuation of teams in the leagues. Since this is a global site, and not a community thing like yours, it's going to be an aweful lot harder to keep clans exactly as they were the previous season. That's not going to happen anyway if you recruit outside. At least when you field your own players, it is actually a team effort.
Jesus, one last time.
I am looking at the Clan Leagues from the perspective of someone who plays for a Club, in an OTB LEAGUE. Each year, i participate in a team with my fellow Club players. We meet the same teams in our League each year (season). Over the years, rivalries have emerged, certain teams have gained reputations, etc, ther are grudge mat ...[text shortened]... ]wrong[/i] with allowing Clans to recruit players to play in a League Team? Answer me that.
Originally posted by marinakatombYou're sidestepping the point. I'm not saying that it is wrong for a team to recruit players for a league team. I'm saying that it is wrong to recruit additional players for a league team. What is the point of having a league if the members are "additional" members of the clans they represent?
Jesus, one last time.
I am looking at the Clan Leagues from the perspective of someone who plays for a Club, in an OTB LEAGUE. Each year, i participate in a team with my fellow Club players. We meet the same teams in our League each year (season). Over the years, rivalries have emerged, certain teams have gained reputations, etc, ther are grudge mat ]wrong[/i] with allowing Clans to recruit players to play in a League Team? Answer me that.
Originally posted by hopscotchSo do you want a 20vs20 or not?!
You're sidestepping the point. I'm not saying that it is wrong for a team to recruit players for a league team. I'm saying that it is wrong to recruit additional players for a league team. What is the point of having a league if the members are "additional" members of the clans they represent?
You can't compare your OTB league to the clan league here o ...[text shortened]... ir temporary membership of some wannabe clan.
Your idea would kill the clan leagues.
Originally posted by hopscotchOk, i can accept that. You've addressed my post, thank you! Perhaps you're right in a way. The major difference between my Club and my Clan is that my Club can have as many members as it likes. If the Clan system worked the same way, then i'm sure that quite quickly you'd have a similar system appearing in the Clan Leagues as you have in standard Club chess all around the World. Big Teams fill the top Leagues with well paired teams. The Leagues are competitive and each year you see the same teams. I don't see why RHP has to be different. I guess what i'm basically saying is that there doesn't seem to be any reason to limit the size of the Clans to 20. I don't really see a reason to limit them at all in fact.
You're sidestepping the point. I'm not saying that it is wrong for a team to recruit players for a league team. I'm saying that it is wrong to recruit additional players for a league team. What is the point of having a league if the members are "additional" members of the clans they represent?
You can't compare your OTB league to the clan league here o ...[text shortened]... ir temporary membership of some wannabe clan.
Your idea would kill the clan leagues.
Originally posted by marinakatombThen you're in the wrong thread, go here: Thread 40433
Ok, i can accept that. You've addressed my post, thank you! Perhaps you're right in a way. The major difference between my Club and my Clan is that my Club can have as many members as it likes. If the Clan system worked the same way, then i'm sure that quite quickly you'd have a similar system appearing in the Clan Leagues as you have in standard Club c ...[text shortened]... t the size of the Clans to 20. I don't really see a reason to limit them at all in fact.
Originally posted by hopscotchThat's kinda what I figure Hopalong... getting squirmy yet, my little toad buggerer? 😛
As I take such pleasure in explaining the blatantly obvious... you have In Vino Veritas, their progress in challenge points (net and total) is intimidating to any clan leader, considering that they're not even one year old yet. Widget has coordinated his clan very well and is only now taking an interest in the leagues.