Clan limits

Originally posted by SJ247
While I appreciate your smartassed remark here,

Sounds to me like a very reasonable suggestion. But then I don't have a gigantic chip on my shoulder.

It is very easy to set up a private forums outside of RHP allowing as many deviants as you want.

D

Originally posted by Ragnorak
Sounds to me like a very reasonable suggestion. But then I don't have a gigantic chip on my shoulder.

It is very easy to set up a private forums outside of RHP allowing as many deviants as you want.

D

But easier still to set up the private forum here, where the deviants already are.... 😛

Originally posted by leisurelysloth
But easier still to set up the private forum here, where the deviants already are.... 😛

If they're that deviant, they'll go to where the 'action' is.

Originally posted by SJ247
Why should clan leader be the voters with regard to member number? It's the clan leaders that are starting and maintaining the clans.

You answered your own stupid question woman

More people in a single clan means even more work for the clan leader in question. If he/she decides to stay with 20 in total, then based on the clan system the clan becomes less competitive compared with clans of 25, 30 or more members ... To offset this the clan in question would have to play more challenges meaning more games per clan member.

Either way would mean more work for a clan leader and subsequently it was quite rightly of Russ to put the initial clan vote up only for clan leaders. And since nothing has changed to the world of clans at RHP I don't see a single good reason why the 19 member rule should change. If you are a good enough clan leader to attract and maintain 19 active members and have more people wanting to join your clan create your own waiting list or have a look through the ranks whether there are people who aren't really committed to the clan per se

Just my 2 cents

TSP

I would like to see more members in a CLAN, may be 35 or 40 or so to allow the members already having a load of games going to finish when ever and there could be a number as REGULAR players and other and part time players.

Seeing there is so many CHALLENGEs yet to get started and SOME of US wanting to play more but uble to for the SAKE of getting some REAL MONEY to survive

Originally posted by pakeha
I would like to see more members in a CLAN, may be 35 or 40 or so to allow the members already having a load of games going to finish when ever and there could be a number as REGULAR players and other and part time players.

Seeing there is so many CHALLENGEs yet to get started and SOME of US wanting to play more but uble to for the SAKE of getting some REAL MONEY to survive

Hot topic...

I posted this in the other thread:

Clans can be most easily described as sub-groups of tribes and usually constitute groups of 7000 to 10 000 people.

(From Wikipedia)

P-

Originally posted by Will Everitt
I don't think it is a good idea. The highest rated clan could just be the one with the most members and I think all clans should have an equalish chance of doing well. If you want more people set up a redhotpawn/redhotporn forum site.

Keep it at 20.

I disagree. At present Clans have to choose between League status and Challenge status. You can't do well in both, unless you have a clan full of super fast moving players who are comfotable with hundreds of games and can perform well with said games all running concurrently.

I think Clans should be considered like Clubs. If a Clan can have an undefined amount of people then they can commit to more things. I'd love to run teams in every league, but it's simply impossible as things stand. I think people should be limited to membership of one clan, but they should be free to be a leader of another clan (so two in total, but one of those must be their own clan...)

I think this approach would make the League system much more competitive. Also it would allow MASSIVE Challenges (100v100!!!), that would be cooooool!!!! 😀😀