1. Joined
    22 Aug '05
    Moves
    26450
    06 Jul '06 16:30
    What about having an option for non-subscribers to donate what they can afford rather than subscribing - no other benefits would be expected.
    The reasoning is they would then feel justified in blocking ads at the same time as contributing to the site.
    It could also have the beneficial side-effect of cutting down the anti non-sub nastiness. There would not have to be any sign next to their names or any other changes. Maybe once a year an announcement of how many [not who] had donated.

    Just a thought.
  2. SubscriberBigDoggProblem
    The Advanced Mind
    bigdogghouse.com/RHP
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    114819
    06 Jul '06 16:59
    Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
    What about having an option for non-subscribers to donate what they can afford rather than subscribing - no other benefits would be expected.
    The reasoning is they would then feel justified in blocking ads at the same time as contributing to the site.
    It could also have the beneficial side-effect of cutting down the anti non-sub nastiness. There w ...[text shortened]... hanges. Maybe once a year an announcement of how many [not who] had donated.

    Just a thought.
    I would like to see some of our saintly subscribers exercise this option and prove to the world that they're making a great contribution to humanity without expecting extra features in return.
  3. Standard memberXanthosNZ
    Cancerous Bus Crash
    p^2.sin(phi)
    Joined
    06 Sep '04
    Moves
    25076
    06 Jul '06 17:34
    Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
    I would like to see some of our saintly subscribers exercise this option and prove to the world that they're making a great contribution to humanity without expecting extra features in return.
    Some subscribers donate by buying non-subs subscriptions. Someone bought me a subscription last year out of the blue. I still don't know who. It expired recently and I rebought my sub myself. I don't know if I'd be a subscriber now if that sub hadn't been bought for me.
  4. Subscriberinvigorate
    Only 1 F in Uckfield
    Buxted UK
    Joined
    27 Feb '02
    Moves
    212208
    06 Jul '06 17:54
    Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
    I would like to see some of our saintly subscribers exercise this option and prove to the world that they're making a great contribution to humanity without expecting extra features in return.
    I have bought subscriptions for non subs before. Sadly not you, Xanth, but I like the option of remaining anonymous.

    Previously I have chosen inteligent non-subs who have not moaned in the forums about subscriptions, but have got positive things to contribute to the site a year of TFC benefits. Sorry BigDogg looks like it won't be you either!
  5. Subscriberhuckleberryhound
    Devout Agnostic.
    DZ-015
    Joined
    12 Oct '05
    Moves
    42015
    06 Jul '06 18:272 edits
    It would be helpful for those who live in third world economies.
    Some people from Eastern european countries, or India for example, might not be able to afford $30 (this being a months earnings for some).
    Unfortunately there would be too much abuse of this, i think,especially from those who are just too mean to contribute properly.
  6. Joined
    22 Aug '05
    Moves
    26450
    06 Jul '06 19:29
    Originally posted by huckleberryhound
    It would be helpful for those who live in third world economies.
    Some people from Eastern european countries, or India for example, might not be able to afford $30 (this being a months earnings for some).
    Unfortunately there would be too much abuse of this, i think,especially from those who are just too mean to contribute properly.
    Well if it was an anonymous donation,[ie anonymous to other members] that would not really apply.
    Would it?
  7. Subscriberhuckleberryhound
    Devout Agnostic.
    DZ-015
    Joined
    12 Oct '05
    Moves
    42015
    06 Jul '06 19:39
    Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
    Well if it was an anonymous donation,[ie anonymous to other members] that would not really apply.
    Would it?
    i don't understand your point. explain why anonimity would make a difference ?
  8. Joined
    22 Aug '05
    Moves
    26450
    06 Jul '06 20:212 edits
    As it would be to help the economics of the site and not as a flag to show how good/clever/generous you are. It would be a matter between the site owners and the donator.


    Don't misunderstand me - I'm not saying for it to take the place of subscribing, but additional to, for non-subscribers who would like to contribute financially but do not want the subscriber benefits. There would be no extras for them in my scenario.
  9. Subscriberhuckleberryhound
    Devout Agnostic.
    DZ-015
    Joined
    12 Oct '05
    Moves
    42015
    06 Jul '06 20:48
    Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
    As it would be to help the economics of the site and not as a flag to show how good/clever/generous you are. It would be a matter between the site owners and the donator.


    Don't misunderstand me - I'm not saying for it to take the place of subscribing, but additional to, for non-subscribers who would like to contribute financially but do not want the subscriber benefits. There would be no extras for them in my scenario.
    Then, if you send feedback, or PM russ, i'm sure he'll accept all donations.

    I don't see why he wouldn't
  10. Berks.
    Joined
    27 Nov '04
    Moves
    41991
    06 Jul '06 21:28
    Given a months subscription is less than £4 at the moment, wouldn't just buying one of those make sense?

    Plus you get to try the subs features too?
  11. Joined
    22 Aug '05
    Moves
    26450
    06 Jul '06 21:291 edit
    Originally posted by huckleberryhound
    Then, if you send feedback, or PM russ, i'm sure he'll accept all donations.

    I don't see why he wouldn't
    I'm not saying "how can I donate?" I obviously realise I could personally just send a donation.
    I'm saying it may be an idea to have a set option for it, for any non-subscriber.
  12. Joined
    22 Aug '05
    Moves
    26450
    06 Jul '06 21:32
    Originally posted by Peakite
    Given a months subscription is less than £4 at the moment, wouldn't just buying one of those make sense?

    Plus you get to try the subs features too?
    Some don't have the time or desire for many games or tournaments/clans.
    In fact I definately don't want more than 6 right now.
  13. SubscriberBigDoggProblem
    The Advanced Mind
    bigdogghouse.com/RHP
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    114819
    06 Jul '06 22:14
    Originally posted by invigorate
    Previously I have chosen inteligent non-subs who have not moaned in the forums about subscriptions, but have got positive things to contribute to the site a year of TFC benefits. Sorry BigDogg looks like it won't be you either!
    That's fine; I don't want a subscription to this site.
  14. Standard memberHindstein
    Finish Him!!!
    Chess Club HQ
    Joined
    15 Jun '05
    Moves
    18704
    06 Jul '06 22:38
    Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
    Some don't have the time or desire for many games or tournaments/clans.
    In fact I definately don't want more than 6 right now.
    I appreciate your points, but there is nothing to say that you have to use the extra features of the site when you subscribe. You can subscribe and not use them...

    You can call yourself a donor instead 🙂

    ... and just to pre-empt a sarcastic response from BigDogg, one of my clansmen likes to keep his game count down to 6 or so, and he doesn't seem to enter tournaments or sieges either. These people do exist.
  15. Joined
    22 Aug '05
    Moves
    26450
    07 Jul '06 00:00
    Originally posted by Hindstein
    ...there is nothing to say that you have to use the extra features of the site when you subscribe. You can subscribe and not use them...

    You can call yourself a donor instead 🙂
    Good point. That would be another approach I guess.
Back to Top