@contenchess saidIn fact I think the count was established after people edited their posts and replies didn't fit afterwards...
Do we really need to be told and reminded how many times we made a mistake and had to edit a post?
Some of us are drinkers ðš or smokers ðŽ ...or both ðĪŠ
4 edits for affect.
@ponderable saidYa I can see some edits not lining up with replies...but still...
In fact I think the count was established after people edited their posts and replies didn't fit afterwards...
You get to 4 or 5 edits and it's embarrassing ðģ
No need for a scorecard...
There's a reason for that little "preview before post" tickbox just below the typing box. It was added years ago when this topic last appeared in Site Ideas. You can clean up your post before it goes out to the world.
Of course, it isn't useful when you're soberly reading what you posted in a fit of drunken insanity the night before. ðĻ
@contenchess saidIt's always the losers who complain about displaying the score.
Ya I can see some edits not lining up with replies...but still...
You get to 4 or 5 edits and it's embarrassing ðģ
No need for a scorecard...
@contenchess saidYou are almost never "good".
@Kewpie
In the morning I check my forum posts to see how bad I was.
Lately I've been good ð
@kevin-eleven removed their quoted postIs it just my perception or are we seeing more "removed by poster" items to scroll through these days?
Maybe it's a bit like playing chess on here.
If posters would take a minute to review their post before pressing the "post" button?
@contenchess saidOh now, at one time I had "The Editor" as my fake title. Just roll with it. ð
Do we really need to be told and reminded how many times we made a mistake and had to edit a post?
