Originally posted by rh741 i know thats why i want russ to sell things and put donations,and other things
But do you agree that the way Russ chooses to make the site profitable is his own lookout? If he decided to limit subscribers to not posting in the forums, 1 game at a time and a max of 20 overall that would be his choice.
Be thankful for what you get.
PS. Stop filling the Meet Opponents forum with your crap posting.
Originally posted by rh741 yea but listen this isnt fair to others
Which others? And why isn't it fair? It seems perfectly fair to me and did back when I was a non-sub. If you pay you get full access to the site, if you don't pay to get limited access.
Originally posted by rh741 yea but listen this isnt fair to others
Life isn't fair.
Stop moaning. You're not owed a chess clan. Just like there's plenty of houses in the world that I can't afford to buy, I don't think that that means they should all be free instead.
Personally i disagree with it, maybe setting limitations to it as well would help, maybe only being able to join one team at a given time, and can not switch (join) another team while playing a game for one, to go further, maybe allowing only 4 games for clan games, would also add to the limits, they need to at least taste the flavor of clan play, personally i enjoy playing team games, though i havent done it here before but i do know how it goes cause of the other site im on
Originally posted by McKnights Personally i disagree with it, maybe setting limitations to it as well would help, maybe only being able to join one team at a given time, and can not switch (join) another team while playing a game for one, to go further, maybe allowing only 4 games for clan games, would also add to the limits, they need to at least taste the flavor of clan play, personal ...[text shortened]... mes, though i havent done it here before but i do know how it goes cause of the other site im on
No, non-subs should get the minimum. [6 games is enough]
Any more and you'd never hear the last of it from the subs - it's bad enough as it is. 😕