20 Sep '12 17:53>
I propose that PGN comments be moved to the side of the board where there is more room for them.
http://i47.tinypic.com/25f3987.png
http://i47.tinypic.com/25f3987.png
Originally posted by SwissGambitIf all previous pgn forum posts automatically 'accommodated' this change then it's a sensible use of the otherwise limited space...
I propose that PGN comments be moved to the side of the board where there is more room for them.
http://i47.tinypic.com/25f3987.png
Originally posted by greenpawn34It's busted. Sometimes the comments don't even come up when they're supposed to. I had to look at the PGN source to see some of them when I read your blog.
If it aint bust then don't fix it.
It works, it they start tinkering and tampering then the notes will start
appearing in other threads or even upside down.
Leave well alone.
I'd like a colour thingy though so you can highlight a weak square, a long
diagonal/open file, loose piece etc. But that is light years away.
First the RHP DB must get updated.
Originally posted by KewpieYes, I've been keeping a close eye \ ear and whatever else is 'needed' on all this, for some time now..it really is 'imminent' though. There is obviously a lot more detail involved than we could imagine....wellllll, it is for those of us that don't know one end of the 'mighty code' from another 😀
Wonder what's happening to the new you-beaut user interface that we were promised light-years ago?
Originally posted by SwissGambitIt looks good...it's a shame I just can't make friends with firefox. IF there was a chrome version; 🙂
This suggestion is now a reality for Greasemonkey users:
Thread 149178
Originally posted by RevRSleekerI read somewhere that chrome may soon (if it doesn't already) support greasemonkey scripts.
It looks good...it's a shame I just can't make friends with firefox. IF there was a chrome version; 🙂
Originally posted by SwissGambitIt's just easier to work with, all in...it fires up so so quickly, 3 or 4 seconds..it has one process per tab and you can search the web directly from the address bar.. and the pages just load that much quicker, taken from my own experiences with most other browsers ( and I include Safari with the mac also )..Firefox was never overly slow loading or anything but it takes its time launching.. to be honest they're becoming more and more alike these days, BUT it still makes me cringe when I think how long I stuck with I.E. Never again lol.
I read somewhere that chrome may soon (if it doesn't already) support greasemonkey scripts.
Edit: I am curious - what does Chrome have that Firefox does not?
Originally posted by RevRSleekerYou can search from the address bar in Firefox, too, although I like the search box, because I've got a few different search engines in it: dictionaries, IMDB, Google Encrypted, etc.
It's just easier to work with, all in...it fires up so so quickly, 3 or 4 seconds..it has one process per tab and you can search the web directly from the address bar.. and the pages just load that much quicker, taken from my own experiences with most other browsers ( and I include Safari with the mac also )..Firefox was never overly slow loading or anyt ...[text shortened]... d apparently the 'V8 JavaScript engine' is something to write home about with chrome also 😉