Go back
Recs per post

Recs per post

Site Ideas

Vote Up
Vote Down

How about a recs per post stat instead of recs? It might stop some of the crap the forums get buried in.

3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Pullhard
How about a recs per post stat instead of recs? It might stop some of the crap the forums get buried in.
Oh I'm going to lose in that stat.

EDIT: 3266 posts (that haven't been deleted) and 416 recs gives 0.12737 recs per post.

Worse however it gives 10.17 posts per day 😲

EDIT2: Maybe mine isn't so bad Phlabibit scores 0.07095. And as a bonus when making his first ever post he typed in the wrong box.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
Oh I'm going to lose in that stat.

EDIT: 3266 posts (that haven't been deleted) and 416 recs gives 0.12737 recs per post.

Worse however it gives 10.17 posts per day 😲
Still thrashing me though. 514 posts with 56 recs giving a ratio of 0.1089.

EDIT: Out of curiosity, I checked out shavixmir. 4451 posts with 898 recs. An impressive 0.2018!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
Oh I'm going to lose in that stat.

EDIT: 3266 posts (that haven't been deleted) and 416 recs gives 0.12737 recs per post.

Worse however it gives 10.17 posts per day 😲

EDIT2: Maybe mine isn't so bad Phlabibit scores 0.07095. And as a bonus when making his first ever post he typed in the wrong box.
I posted years before there was a rec system, and sometimes I'm forced to say things few would like....

Other than that... yes, I post a lot.

P-

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by lausey
Still thrashing me though. 514 posts with 56 recs giving a ratio of 0.1089.

EDIT: Out of curiosity, I checked out shavixmir. 4451 posts with 898 recs. An impressive 0.2018!
Pradtf

.447004

P-

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
Pradtf

.447004

P-
Even beats katty (0.26561).

EDIT: Bad news though, Ironman31 wins with a whopping 1.48718 recs per post.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Does this mean you all like the idea?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Pullhard
Does this mean you all like the idea?
No. We like wasting time with numbers.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
No. We like wasting time with numbers.
*Rim Shot

Pah-dump Tsh!

P-

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
No. We like wasting time with numbers.
You are too cool

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
Oh I'm going to lose in that stat.

EDIT: 3266 posts (that haven't been deleted) and 416 recs gives 0.12737 recs per post.

Worse however it gives 10.17 posts per day 😲

EDIT2: Maybe mine isn't so bad Phlabibit scores 0.07095. And as a bonus when making his first ever post he typed in the wrong box.
Where does one get one's number of posts from?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivangrice
Where does one get one's number of posts from?
Do a search on a particular player, see the number of pages of posts they have. There are 15 posts per page so you can calculate the number of posts.

Obviously the last page wouldn't necessarily have 15 posts, so you would have to take that into account.

Vote Up
Vote Down

I did recs per MOVE about a year ago, that's a lot easier to calculate. It's also a good way of working out who comes here to play chess and who comes here to fill the emptiness of their life by moping around the forums.

My recs per move is pretty high, unfortunately.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by orfeo
I did recs per MOVE about a year ago, that's a lot easier to calculate. It's also a good way of working out who comes here to play chess and who comes here to fill the emptiness of their life by moping around the forums.

My recs per move is pretty high, unfortunately.
You spelled LOW wrong.

P-

Vote Up
Vote Down

How did you guys find out how many posts you've made?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.