Go back
This should be forbidden and bannable

This should be forbidden and bannable

Site Ideas

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ragnorak
Is allow you to do it what you mean when you say "Anyone that don't believe me, say so, and you'll lose a game without you even know it, [b]not even can hinder it, in any way. "? 😀

D[/b]
You're trying to get off the hook. The purpuse of the possibility to challenge eachother is not to in the most ultimate way hinder people to challenge you.

Now, what do you think of IE, now when you have it installed and are using it? Rather nice, don't you think? 😏

Enough of this betting with Ragnorak, anyway...

And yes, it doesn't change the win/lose statistics, it doesn't changes rating for any of the players - but I still think it is an undfriendly act and should be made not possible to do this by the system.
This is my opinion.

Vote Up
Vote Down

They really should call this "Site Ideas & Debate"

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty
They really should call this "Site Ideas & Debate"
That's assumed for all of the forums. Very few threads have everyone agreeing. I suppose the exception would be the Spirituality forum where seldom is heard a discouraging word?

Vote Up
Vote Down

P.S. I agree with Fabian Fnas. Down with nastiness! 😠

Vote Up
Vote Down

Everything should be bannable!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
Everything should be bannable!
Yes, even negativism...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Yes, even negativism...
I banned a man in Reno, just to hear him whine.

P-

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
I banned a man in Reno, just to hear him whine.

P-
That is just having too much fun.....!!!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Proposal: ban challenging removed players.

Although nicohuyboom was banned over 8 months ago, artplayer challenged him three days ago, hoping for a timeout win, I suppose. A way to get some cheap points. Banned players should have their "challenge player" function inactive. Can I get an "amen"!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by lazycuban
Proposal: ban challenging removed players.

Although nicohuyboom was banned over 8 months ago, artplayer challenged him three days ago, hoping for a timeout win, I suppose. A way to get some cheap points. Banned players should have their "challenge player" function inactive. Can I get an "amen"!
Whilst it makes sense to have banned players unable to be challenged, this isn't a way to get cheap points. As it won't reach the 2nd move, let alone the 3rd, ratings will be unaffected.

Vote Up
Vote Down

"AMEN"

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
I let the Game 2989194 speak for itself.
Who won and how?
Who would accept such a game? 🙄

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Marinkatomb
Who would accept such a game? 🙄
He didn't even got the chance to either accept the game nor decline it by deletion. The win took place seconds after the challenge. The opponent wasn't even around when it happened.

If you let med challenge you I'd win exactly the same way and then you'll understand.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
He didn't even got the chance to either accept the game nor decline it by deletion. The win took place seconds after the challenge. The opponent wasn't even around when it happened.

If you let med challenge you I'd win exactly the same way and then you'll understand.
This has happened to me before actually. The only thing that is annoying is that it registers a loss in your stats, but your rating isn't effected...

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Marinkatomb
This has happened to me before actually. The only thing that is annoying is that it registers a loss in your stats, but your rating isn't effected...
If you're stupid enough to accept a Set Piece game without checking how the board is setup, then you deserve to be beaten and have a loss on your account.

EDIT: That wasn't directed at you Cap'n, it was a general statement.