Originally posted by mikelomWhat I agree on is the "other limit" put on the recs that Trev is glossing over. There is one, and only one, vote to a customer. What can be more fair than that? You don't know what these voters are thinking, so no one (I said NO ONE) has a right to limit their vote. As long as one is free to vote up OR down, the voting is fair as it stands. You don't like the vote? Suck it up and write a better post next time.
Come on Suzi, that's a bit harsh.
I agree with Trev's point - even if it was his post. I'll take the opportunity to make that the same thing happens to me since the thumbs up/down. If you recall, a few times a year I spend some time creating a post that contains all of the most recent GF poster's names. In the old system those posts would receive in the r ...[text shortened]... nting thumb for the heck of it - without thought.
Wouldn't you agree on that one?
-m.
Yes, I like the current system because people can't just abuse other people (or their intelligence) and get a pile of recs without getting a bigger pile of anti-recs.
Originally posted by Trev33I don't think I'd allow myself to put the words literary and genius together in a post to you unless I put the quotation marks on to show that in this case, those words don't really go together.
Don't put quotation marks over something i didn't say, i believe it was 'literacy gold' and it regarding something something that has nothing to do with this thread and certainly wasn't taken seriously by the two people it concerned.
