1. Joined
    16 Oct '06
    Moves
    4532
    09 Jan '07 14:51
    Originally posted by Russ
    Vacation system is coming. (Coded already, about to be tested)

    Timeouts for clan challenge games is coming too, but it will apply only to games where neither player has moved for 6 weeks. The purpose is not so much to make people move within the time controls, but to tidy up abandoned games and bring challenges to a conclusion.

    So, very distinct from the tournament timeouts.

    -Russ
    Great news on both counts.

    I may go and join another clan to celebrate.
  2. Standard memberMarinkatomb
    wotagr8game
    tbc
    Joined
    18 Feb '04
    Moves
    61941
    09 Jan '07 17:01
    Originally posted by Russ
    Vacation system is coming. (Coded already, about to be tested)

    Timeouts for clan challenge games is coming too, but it will apply only to games where neither player has moved for 6 weeks. The purpose is not so much to make people move within the time controls, but to tidy up abandoned games and bring challenges to a conclusion.

    So, very distinct from the tournament timeouts.

    -Russ
    I don't quite understand why it has to be different from tournament games? Both are competitive games, both should have enforced timecontrols, surely?
  3. SubscriberRuss
    RHP Code Monkey
    RHP HQ
    Joined
    21 Feb '01
    Moves
    2396
    09 Jan '07 19:51
    There are no additional rounds to progress to, so if 2 people wish to lengthen their game, they can. Normal manual timeout rules apply, so it is just a matter of choice.

    -Russ
  4. Standard memberThe Slow Pawn
    HIT THE LIGHTS
    Joined
    15 Nov '03
    Moves
    57135
    19 Jan '07 07:27
    So is this challenge 29361 likely to be finished then ??

    TsP
  5. Joined
    09 Jun '04
    Moves
    39731
    18 Feb '07 10:34
    Originally posted by Russ
    Timeouts for clan challenge games is coming too, but it will apply only to games where neither player has moved for 6 weeks.
    BUMP

    How long before this is implemented?
  6. Standard memberThe Slow Pawn
    HIT THE LIGHTS
    Joined
    15 Nov '03
    Moves
    57135
    21 Feb '07 20:06
    BUMP

    Russ, you on it mate ?

    TsP
  7. Standard memberGatecrasher
    Whale watching
    33°36'S 26°53'E
    Joined
    05 Feb '04
    Moves
    41150
    21 Feb '07 22:40
    Originally posted by Ian68
    This idea won't work. It won't work for a reason.

    http://www.redhotpawn.com/vote/result.php?voteid=13
    That was a "happy"ness vote. Not a vote on whether to implement a superfluous vacation period or not.

    Would you be happy if rains next week?

    Yes: 1472
    No: 672

    So let there be rain.

    But if the question was: Do you want rain next week? You will not get the same answer.

    If the question was "Are you happy with the timeout/timebank system?"
    what would the result have been.

    I believe there would have been an overwhelming "Yes" vote as well.

    The admins think they have consulted with the membership. But they haven't.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree