11 Jun 05
Originally posted by invigorateMe too, with the exception of tournaments and leagues.
I used to take time outs but now I dont really bother. recording timeouts would give a misleading assessment of my new more generous character
I like to see how many games with skulls I can collect. I have eleven of them at this moment.
11 Jun 05
Originally posted by inwerdsI'd like to see that to.
i think it would be a good idea to list the number of timeouts a player has in their Profile - so i can choose not to play joeschmo because he tends to start a game a never finish it.
Partly to avoid players who never finish, but I think it would make clans work better. It seems to me that one of the big problems lots of clans have is people join, get put into a bunch of challenges, then don't finish. This really makes it tough to win those challenges.
11 Jun 05
Originally posted by RookRAKA good clan leader will manage the people in his clan and make sure they have an appropriate game load. If someone isn't working for the clan after a game or two...give them a kick. Get in people who respect the clan and won't mess around in challenges.
It seems to me that one of the big problems lots of clans have is people join, get put into a bunch of challenges, then don't finish. This really makes it tough to win those challenges.
A clan doesn't deserve to win a challenge if it has renegades that don't give a stuff...
JP.
- Joined
- 03 Mar 05
- Moves
- 22288
11 Jun 05
Originally posted by RedmikeOriginally posted by Redmike
I think the original idea was stats on how many games a player has lost by timeout.
Not how many times they've won by timeout.
I think the original idea was stats on how many games a player has lost by timeout.
Not how many times they've won by timeout.
thanks redmike - that is exactly what i was trying to say.
13 Jun 05
1) Showing how many times a player has timed-out other opponents is an irrelevance. It carries the notion that these players are somehow being 'unsporting' when in fact their behaviour is well within the RHP rules.
2) Showing how many times a player has been timed-out is of more interest. If you can see that an opponent loses half of their games through not moving quickly enough it would tell you that you might not get much of a game with them.
13 Jun 05
Originally posted by Poisoned PawnIf it is in the rules then it is purely a construct of the site community that has led to this being seen as unsporting.
1) Showing how many times a player has timed-out other opponents is an irrelevance. It carries the notion that these players are somehow being 'unsporting' when in fact their behaviour is well within the RHP rules.
It is not irrelevant to show this stat if there are site members who would be interested to know this about their opponents.