20 Oct 09
Here's a simple two-rule solution:
#1 Clans are provisionally created and cannot play any matches until five members are registered.
#2 Clan memberships cannot fall below five members.
Objection?
What if the leader wants to boot a member who goes absent or become obnoxious?
Response:
That actually makes the dynamics of clan membership and leadership much more interesting and leads to more careful recruiting and acceptance.
It's just a suggestion.
- Joined
- 10 Jan 08
- Moves
- 16953
20 Oct 09
Originally posted by coquetteyou can't do away with one man clans. some people (me) don't want the trouble of having a load of other people in there clan and having to set up games for them etc. the reason why i have my clan is so i get to choose who i play... points and everything else that goes with a clan isn't important. it's the best way to get 2 games against higher rated people who otherwise wouldn't be interested.
Yeah, can't argue with your logic. rec'd.
20 Oct 09
Originally posted by coquetteAgain, so what? Why does it matter that there are inactive clans?
Here's a simple two-rule solution:
#1 Clans are provisionally created and cannot play any matches until five members are registered.
#2 Clan memberships cannot fall below five members.
Objection?
What if the leader wants to boot a member who goes absent or become obnoxious?
Response:
That actually makes the dynamics of clan membership and ...[text shortened]... re interesting and leads to more careful recruiting and acceptance.
It's just a suggestion.