@roigam

-Removed-

Incoherent exegesis is my guess. Based on something roigam said elsewhere, I think he believes that because death is the consequence of sin, that when one dies it is payment for one's sins.

Of course that idea, logically, means that Jesus' death is for naught.

Originally posted by josephw
Incoherent exegesis is my guess. Based on something roigam said elsewhere, I think he believes that because death is the consequence of sin, that when one dies it is payment for one's sins.

Of course that idea, logically, means that Jesus' death is for naught.

never read - 'the wages of sin is death ?' - you noobs should try reading the Bible.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
never read - 'the wages of sin is death ?' - you noobs should try reading the Bible.

What your Bible says is "For the wages sin pays is death".

Do you ever read the NWT anymore? I notice you stopped trying to stand up for it in arguments. Recognizing it as ludicrous would be a good first step. I realize you have a public persona to project, though.

Tell me one thing: Why isn't the NWT at jw.org searchable online? Are they afraid more people might see their alterations to the Word of God?

Originally posted by Suzianne
Tell me one thing: Why isn't the NWT at jw.org searchable online? Are they afraid more people might see their alterations to the Word of God?

Can you say what you personally feel are the three or so most egregious and crucial "alterations" found in the NWT?

Originally posted by Suzianne
What your Bible says is "For the wages sin pays is death".

Do you ever read the NWT anymore? I notice you stopped trying to stand up for it in arguments. Recognizing it as ludicrous would be a good first step. I realize you have a public persona to project, though.

Tell me one thing: Why isn't the NWT at jw.org searchable online? Are they afraid more people might see their alterations to the Word of God?

Actually its the very first item on the page. I don't know where you got the idea that its not searchable on-line, perhaps your aluminium foil hat needs adjusting?

https://www.jw.org/en/publications/bible/nwt/books/

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Actually its the very first item on the page. I don't know where you got the idea that its not searchable on-line, perhaps your aluminium foil hat needs adjusting?

https://www.jw.org/en/publications/bible/nwt/books/

You're being very untruthful, robbie.

The "search" on this page is a search of "jw.org", not a search of the NWT.

Now answer my question.

Originally posted by FMF
Can you say what you personally feel are the three or so most egregious and crucial "alterations" found in the NWT?

No, I can't, or rather, more specifically, I won't.

Do your own homework.

I'm not here for your entertainment.

Originally posted by Suzianne
Do your own homework.

That wouldn't work because the question to you is Can you say what you personally feel are the three or so most egregious and crucial "alterations" found in the NWT? The reason I ask is because you fling the same little claim at the JWs over and over and over again, but when asked to substantiate it, you always deflect or ignore the request. I am asking you what you believe are the most serious "alterations". This is not something I can do homework about. It's simply a question for you to answer.

Originally posted by Suzianne
You're being very untruthful, robbie.

The "search" on this page is a search of "jw.org", not a search of the NWT.

Now answer my question.

You are wrong, it cites the NWT in chapter and verse. You would know that of you went to the link but clearly you have not. Oh dear, a rather poor show even by your low standards.

Originally posted by Suzianne
No, I can't, or rather, more specifically, I won't.

Do your own homework.

I'm not here for your entertainment.

nor it seems to substantiate your claims.