Spirituality
02 Apr 17
Originally posted by divegeesterIncoherent exegesis is my guess. Based on something roigam said elsewhere, I think he believes that because death is the consequence of sin, that when one dies it is payment for one's sins.
Please explain your claim that the multitudes who have died have "paid" or thief own sins through their own deaths.
Of course that idea, logically, means that Jesus' death is for naught.
04 Apr 17
Originally posted by josephwnever read - 'the wages of sin is death ?' - you noobs should try reading the Bible.
Incoherent exegesis is my guess. Based on something roigam said elsewhere, I think he believes that because death is the consequence of sin, that when one dies it is payment for one's sins.
Of course that idea, logically, means that Jesus' death is for naught.
08 Apr 17
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat your Bible says is "For the wages sin pays is death".
never read - 'the wages of sin is death ?' - you noobs should try reading the Bible.
Do you ever read the NWT anymore? I notice you stopped trying to stand up for it in arguments. Recognizing it as ludicrous would be a good first step. I realize you have a public persona to project, though.
Tell me one thing: Why isn't the NWT at jw.org searchable online? Are they afraid more people might see their alterations to the Word of God?
Originally posted by SuzianneCan you say what you personally feel are the three or so most egregious and crucial "alterations" found in the NWT?
Tell me one thing: Why isn't the NWT at jw.org searchable online? Are they afraid more people might see their alterations to the Word of God?
09 Apr 17
Originally posted by SuzianneActually its the very first item on the page. I don't know where you got the idea that its not searchable on-line, perhaps your aluminium foil hat needs adjusting?
What your Bible says is "For the wages sin pays is death".
Do you ever read the NWT anymore? I notice you stopped trying to stand up for it in arguments. Recognizing it as ludicrous would be a good first step. I realize you have a public persona to project, though.
Tell me one thing: Why isn't the NWT at jw.org searchable online? Are they afraid more people might see their alterations to the Word of God?
https://www.jw.org/en/publications/bible/nwt/books/
09 Apr 17
Originally posted by robbie carrobieRoigam seems to have disappeared again; are you willing to respond to the OP on his behalf?
Actually its the very first item on the page. I don't know where you got the idea that its not searchable on-line, perhaps your aluminium foil hat needs adjusting?
https://www.jw.org/en/publications/bible/nwt/books/
10 Apr 17
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou're being very untruthful, robbie.
Actually its the very first item on the page. I don't know where you got the idea that its not searchable on-line, perhaps your aluminium foil hat needs adjusting?
https://www.jw.org/en/publications/bible/nwt/books/
The "search" on this page is a search of "jw.org", not a search of the NWT.
Now answer my question.
Originally posted by SuzianneThat wouldn't work because the question to you is Can you say what you personally feel are the three or so most egregious and crucial "alterations" found in the NWT? The reason I ask is because you fling the same little claim at the JWs over and over and over again, but when asked to substantiate it, you always deflect or ignore the request. I am asking you what you believe are the most serious "alterations". This is not something I can do homework about. It's simply a question for you to answer.
Do your own homework.
10 Apr 17
Originally posted by SuzianneYou are wrong, it cites the NWT in chapter and verse. You would know that of you went to the link but clearly you have not. Oh dear, a rather poor show even by your low standards.
You're being very untruthful, robbie.
The "search" on this page is a search of "jw.org", not a search of the NWT.
Now answer my question.