Originally posted by robbie carrobie You are wrong, it cites the NWT in chapter and verse. You would know that of you went to the link but clearly you have not. Oh dear, a rather poor show even by your low standards.
Clearly I have been to the site, and the Search function is a search OF THE SITE, not the text of your NWT.
I am still waiting for your answer to my question.
Originally posted by FMF That wouldn't work because the question to you is Can you say [b]what you personally feel are the three or so most egregious and crucial "alterations" found in the NWT? The reason I ask is because you fling the same little claim at the JWs over and over and over again, but when asked to substantiate it, you always deflect or ignore the request. I am asking y ...[text shortened]... tions". This is not something I can do homework about. It's simply a question for you to answer.[/b]
Wrong. Both the NWT and the KJV are available online.
Go figure it out yourself. All the data is there.
Now I know that the JWs gutlessly don't allow online searching of the NWT, but search the KJV using any site offering a KJV Bible, and then access the same verse on the jw.org site.
As I said, I'm not here for your entertainment. Figure it out yourself.
Originally posted by FMF My question is about what [b]you personally believe are a few of the most egregious "alterations" found in the NWT, and not about what I believe.[/b]
It's definitely about what you believe.
You believe the scriptures are the fabrication of man. If they are, then no matter which translation it is they're all wrong. Any alterations from one text to the other is of no consequence, but if the scriptures exist as a result of inspiration from God, then even the tiniest change in the text makes the whole corrupt.
I think your question is disingenuous in that you already have your answer.
Originally posted by josephw It's definitely about what you believe.
No, josephw, it's definitely about what Suzianne believes. She keeps mentioning the "alterations" but never, ever specifies which "alterations" she is referring to.
Originally posted by josephw Any alterations from one text to the other is of no consequence, but if the scriptures exist as a result of inspiration from God, then even the tiniest change in the text makes the whole corrupt
Then why won't Suzianne say what she feels are the most of egregious of these "alterations" that she keeps mentioning?
Originally posted by Suzianne Don't hide behind his skirt, robbie.
Why doesn't jw.org provide a search function for the online version of your NWT?
It does I provided the link, you can go there and search the entire Bible. The link takes you directly to the New world translation on-line, its not a search of the entire site as you have ludicrously asserted, it brings up a menu of the Bible, chapters and verse. Its clear that you have not done so and continue to live in denial and perpetuate your busted charade.
Originally posted by Suzianne Wrong. Both the NWT and the KJV are available online.
Go figure it out yourself. All the data is there.
Now I know that the JWs gutlessly don't allow online searching of the NWT, but search the KJV using any site offering a KJV Bible, and then access the same verse on the jw.org site.
As I said, I'm not here for your entertainment. Figure it out yourself.
This is quite simply not true. Anyone can go to jw.org and read and search the Bible for themselves.
@roigam
10 Apr '17 14:081 edit
Back to Top