14 Dec '06 20:16>
Originally posted by whiteroseAbsolutely, I agree. But what if you continued flipping that coin, 1000 times, 10,000 times, 100,000 times, 1,000,000 times, a billion times. Every time, heads. At what point do you decide that it's safe to call it a fact that it's a double headed coin? What about gravity? A fact? Atoms? Fact? That humans require oxygen to live? Fact? Maybe it's just co-incidence that every time you stop someone from breathing that they die.
Ah, but now we get into science as the be-all and end-all of the universe. If science says it, then it must be a fact. How did we get the current laws of physics, chemistry, and biology? By observation of the world around us. They are very useful laws, but probably not perfect. Therefore, to say that something is a "fact" because the laws of physics, which ...[text shortened]... headed. In all likelyhood it is, but there is always the remote possibility that it is not.
It comes down to this sort of pedantics, I'm afraid. If you seriously analyse the world, there is nothing that could really be called a "fact", if you are the world's most anally retentive person. I, however, am not.