I want to create a new religion based on the following:
1) Life is so miraculous and near perfect that it must have been created (invented and made).
2) Thus, there is indeed a God (Creator) or, indeed, Gods (Creators).
3) BUT!!!! The God /Gods have NEVER, after creation, communicated with humans or any other living things.
4) All who claim to be Prophets of God (s) are deceivers.
5) The real challenge in life is NOT TO CLAIM to be a prophet of God(s).
6) All those who do not claim to be a Prophet of God (s) go to heavan. All those who claim to be a Prophet of God(s) get burned or something terrible.
Originally posted by znshoBy 'creating' a religion are you not to some degree claiming to be a 'prophet of God'? Shall we burn you?
I want to create a new religion based on the following:
1) Life is so miraculous and near perfect that it must have been created (invented and made).
2) Thus, there is indeed a God (Creator) or, indeed, Gods (Creators).
3) BUT!!!! The God /Gods have NEVER, after creation, communicated with humans or any other living things.
4) All who claim to be P ...[text shortened]... s) go to heavan. All those who claim to be a Prophet of God(s) get burned or something terrible.
Originally posted by znsho1) + 2) + 3) = Deism
I want to create a new religion based on the following:
1) Life is so miraculous and near perfect that it must have been created (invented and made).
2) Thus, there is indeed a God (Creator) or, indeed, Gods (Creators).
3) BUT!!!! The God /Gods have NEVER, after creation, communicated with humans or any other living things.
4) All who claim to be P ...[text shortened]... s) go to heavan. All those who claim to be a Prophet of God(s) get burned or something terrible.
Originally posted by znshoTry Hollywood, California. They come up with a new religion every 2-3 weeks! 😏
I want to create a new religion based on the following:
1) Life is so miraculous and near perfect that it must have been created (invented and made).
2) Thus, there is indeed a God (Creator) or, indeed, Gods (Creators).
3) BUT!!!! The God /Gods have NEVER, after creation, communicated with humans or any other living things.
4) All who claim to be P ...[text shortened]... s) go to heavan. All those who claim to be a Prophet of God(s) get burned or something terrible.
Originally posted by twhiteheadYou do not have to trust that I am telling the truth. My new religion is truly free. I know about the creator(s) for the same reason other believers believe - the miracle of life, the universe and everything. The major difference is, I think it must have been a joint effort so I suspect, though can not be certain, that there is more than one creator.
So why should we trust that you are telling the truth? How do you know about the creator?
Originally posted by znshoBut you claimed to know intimate details such as the fact that the creators have never communicated with humans. How did you find that out?
You do not have to trust that I am telling the truth. My new religion is truly free. I know about the creator(s) for the same reason other believers believe - the miracle of life, the universe and everything. The major difference is, I think it must have been a joint effort so I suspect, though can not be certain, that there is more than one creator.
Originally posted by znsho….Life is so miraculous and near perfect that ….
I want to create a new religion based on the following:
1) Life is so miraculous and near perfect that it must have been created (invented and made).
2) Thus, there is indeed a God (Creator) or, indeed, Gods (Creators).
3) BUT!!!! The God /Gods have NEVER, after creation, communicated with humans or any other living things.
4) All who claim to be P ...[text shortened]... s) go to heavan. All those who claim to be a Prophet of God(s) get burned or something terrible.
..…
“near perfect”? I don’t know exactly how “near” it has to be to be “near perfect” but I would say that the fact that such flaws exist in life such as the blood vessels for the human retina being in front of the retina where it partly blocks incoming light etc means you would surely not call it “near perfect”?
So I would say your new religion is a non-starter because this basic assumption can be apparently shown to be wrong.