Originally posted by freightdog37
Many of the scientists that I have posted on earlier came to the realization this way. I think that many of the issues you and I are talking about can be explained fron my point of view in this article.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v22/i1/creation.asp
Concerning the bee situation I was asking, but like I said before not all vegetati ...[text shortened]... flowers to collect nectar and pollen. Moving pollen between flowers is called cross-pollination.
You are supposing the scientists did so. I suppose they were already Christians. Let's ask them.
Now for every one of your creationist scientist there are 100 CHRISTIAN evolution scientists... and 10 000 independent scientists. Do you think they are in a lobby against creation? NO, they are not. They are independent, just trying to find the truth in everyday reality.
Now there's a huge lobby to convince people that the bible is scientificaly correct. Scientific language is used, and it sounds convincing for the non-educated mind. Yet, it's full of errors. It sounds plausible in some arguments, others are just stupid, but MOST of them are easily comproved to be completely wrong.
I don't see anything relevant in the 1st link you sent me except christians need the bible to make their assumptions. The arguments used are philosophical, sometimes stupid.
About the apples: there were no apple trees (or flowers) some million of years ago. They evolved when a more efficient pollinization process appeared (insects). Did you ever wonder this? It's quite simple to explain on evolution theory.
I await for the points where I actually have to make use of more advanced knowledge in science. Tell me about that evidence for creation. That linked showed nothing except that scientists must hear the points of creationists. I'm listening.