13 Nov '06 20:38>1 edit
...in it's biblical form, I have.
It used to be that only those who were properly trained theologians could
make a claim this or that way about the more questionable matters of
the bible. If you were not an educated, and moreover accepted
theologian, anything you could say that would put the Word of God in a
bad light would be considered a blasphemy and you would have to be
punished one way or the other. Well, this isn't exactly news, is it? And
I'm afraid that, as usual, I'm merely pointing out the obvious. But, still,
here it is.
The reason Christianity could have lasted for two thousand years based
on the idea that God created the earth, universe and all in seven days,
that he is a loving and forgiving God even though he has committed
most heinous acts by his own standards, that an eye for an eye but love
your enemy attitude is non-conflictive in nature, is precisely that.
?
That you as a mere non-educated biblist couldn't possibly comprehend
the logic behind Gods thinking and therefore it is not your place to
question his word as spoken through all those special people who wrote
the different parts of the bible. Inspired by God. Who is just. And makes
sense. At least to himself.
But the real mystery should be, why do people still persist to this day
with the validity of the bible? Some need no explanation as they've
completely freed themselves of all forms of critical and intelligible
thinking, but others are more of an enigma (at least to me).
I've come to the conclusion (and I'm sure this has a high bearing on this
community - self sarcasm that was) that perhaps the idea of a Christian
(or otherwise) God is not as dumb as I've always thought. Parts of the
bible still makes sense, I'd have to agree. And I do think that
Christianity has survived simply because of those parts (love thy
neighbour, be wise and drink your milk and all that).
So, to conclude this thing I've written to kill off time, you could say that
even though all those things that makes sense could just as easily have
been derived at from an atheistic point of view, I have to wonder if there
isn't a God thingie in the background after all. But the static interference
between him and his subjects of communication may just make it too
hard to understand him properly (thus the inconsistencies). I'm sure he'll
work it out eventually and then we'll have a bible that's completely
without logical or otherwise flaws.
I think. 😕
Addition: Oh, right! My theory! Uhm, I think it has survived for so
long, despite all those questionable sections of the "good book" because
people, deep down inside, wants to believe (on a conscious or
unconscious level).
Whether God exists or not, as long as he speak of love and forgiveness
and how we can all receive his love if we only open our hearts, people
wants to believe in him. And in wanting to do so, we can explain away the
parts of the bible that isn't too friendly (to our own kind at the very
least).
It used to be that only those who were properly trained theologians could
make a claim this or that way about the more questionable matters of
the bible. If you were not an educated, and moreover accepted
theologian, anything you could say that would put the Word of God in a
bad light would be considered a blasphemy and you would have to be
punished one way or the other. Well, this isn't exactly news, is it? And
I'm afraid that, as usual, I'm merely pointing out the obvious. But, still,
here it is.
The reason Christianity could have lasted for two thousand years based
on the idea that God created the earth, universe and all in seven days,
that he is a loving and forgiving God even though he has committed
most heinous acts by his own standards, that an eye for an eye but love
your enemy attitude is non-conflictive in nature, is precisely that.
?
That you as a mere non-educated biblist couldn't possibly comprehend
the logic behind Gods thinking and therefore it is not your place to
question his word as spoken through all those special people who wrote
the different parts of the bible. Inspired by God. Who is just. And makes
sense. At least to himself.
But the real mystery should be, why do people still persist to this day
with the validity of the bible? Some need no explanation as they've
completely freed themselves of all forms of critical and intelligible
thinking, but others are more of an enigma (at least to me).
I've come to the conclusion (and I'm sure this has a high bearing on this
community - self sarcasm that was) that perhaps the idea of a Christian
(or otherwise) God is not as dumb as I've always thought. Parts of the
bible still makes sense, I'd have to agree. And I do think that
Christianity has survived simply because of those parts (love thy
neighbour, be wise and drink your milk and all that).
So, to conclude this thing I've written to kill off time, you could say that
even though all those things that makes sense could just as easily have
been derived at from an atheistic point of view, I have to wonder if there
isn't a God thingie in the background after all. But the static interference
between him and his subjects of communication may just make it too
hard to understand him properly (thus the inconsistencies). I'm sure he'll
work it out eventually and then we'll have a bible that's completely
without logical or otherwise flaws.
I think. 😕
Addition: Oh, right! My theory! Uhm, I think it has survived for so
long, despite all those questionable sections of the "good book" because
people, deep down inside, wants to believe (on a conscious or
unconscious level).
Whether God exists or not, as long as he speak of love and forgiveness
and how we can all receive his love if we only open our hearts, people
wants to believe in him. And in wanting to do so, we can explain away the
parts of the bible that isn't too friendly (to our own kind at the very
least).