1. Joined
    29 Dec '08
    Moves
    6788
    24 Jan '15 16:06
    A tone-deaf drive to canonize Serra
    CAILLE MILLNER
    On my walk home from work, I pass three storefront evangelical churches. They’re often the only institutions of well repute on those blocks, and their congregants have the pride of people who treasure respectability and order, because there’s so little of those things in their surroundings. The women wear long skirts, the men wear boxy suits, the children have clean collars.

    Some of them were born here, and some of them are immigrants from Mexico or El Salvador or Nicaragua or elsewhere in Latin America, but the crucial point is that they are all from traditionally Catholic cultures, and they’ve all chosen a different church. It’s a distinct choice that can be appreciated even on the most secular level — they’re choosing to spend their time at small storefronts with ugly overhead lighting and bad carpets, instead of in San Francisco’s beautiful Catholic churches. They’re doing this because the faith of their ancestors didn’t hold enough for them.

    I thought about these storefront churches when I heard that Pope Francis is planning to canonize the Rev. Junipero Serra, the priest who “brought” Christianity to California in the late 1700s.

    Or perhaps I should say that I thought about why, despite a wildly popular Latin American pope, the church is struggling to hold onto believers even where it’s strongest. The Serra choice is as fine an example of the church’s tone deafness as I can imagine.

    There are at least two Junipero Serras. There’s the Serra of California’s roadways and statues, the Serra whom California schoolchildren learn about in the fourth grade.

    This is the Serra who was the pious, humble Franciscan. He was a man of immense personal bravery, giving up a comfortable life as a theologian in Spain to bring the Gospel to the Americas. He brought the Gospel to California — at the time one of the most remote and threatened regions of the Spanish empire — along with the famous mission system that became the first permanent European presence on the West Coast.

    Then there’s the Serra whom children don’t learn about in school. This Serra is the figure of serious academic historians and a despised figure in the American Indian community. He was a brutal colonist who exploited the local indigenous communities for their labor and for their souls — Indian recruits were forced to convert, sometimes at gunpoint, and rounded up by soldiers if they tried to escape.

    The local populations extent that even some of Serra’s colleagues felt bad about it: The Indians “live well free but as soon as we reduce them to a Christian and community life ... they fatten, sicken, and die,” wrote a friar at the time.

    The likeliest truth is that Serra was both of these figures: the brave pioneer and the pitiless colonist. He’s the type of person who deserves a lot of academic study but nothing, absolutely nothing, resembling sainthood.

    The puzzle here is that the church doesn’t realize this, especially with the demographic it’s finally being forced to serve. I say finally because it’s taken the church such a long time to recognize that its only hope of survival lies in the global south, especially Latin America.

    Europe has left the Catholic Church, and the United States was never really in the fold. Now that the church is finally being forced to look at the Latin Americans who are left, it wants to canonize a man whose career included brutalizing indigenous people — people who look like, well, current Latin Americans.

    This is far from the only reason why the Catholic Church is in big trouble. The child sex-abuse cases, the rigidity of the Curia, secularism — pick your problem. Not all of them are of the church’s making, but they all count.

    A choice like Serra, on the other hand, is a choice of the church’s making. And that tells us something else. It tells us that the church realizes it’s going to alienate the very communities that it needs for the 21st century. Since it could just as easily choose to leave Serra alone, the church is also saying that it doesn’t care.

    Meanwhile, I peek inside those three evangelical churches every night on my way home. Though their pews may be humble — folding chairs, not wooden benches — they’re always full.

    Caille Millner is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. E-mail: cmillner@  sfchronicle.com   Twitter: @caillemillner
  2. SubscriberSuzianne
    Misfit Queen
    Isle of Misfit Toys
    Joined
    08 Aug '03
    Moves
    35531
    24 Jan '15 16:271 edit
    Originally posted by JS357
    A tone-deaf drive to canonize Serra

    Caille Millner is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. E-mail: cmillner@  sfchronicle.com   Twitter: @caillemillner
    If you don't mind my asking... where is *your* dog in this hunt?

    I assume you agree with the writer. What about the article (or the man) moved you to post this article?
  3. Joined
    29 Dec '08
    Moves
    6788
    24 Jan '15 16:56
    Originally posted by Suzianne
    If you don't mind my asking... where is *your* dog in this hunt?

    I assume you agree with the writer. What about the article (or the man) moved you to post this article?
    I was of two minds about posting this here or in Debates. I have mixed feelings about Pope Francis. I think he is playing politics, giving the conservative traditionalists things that balance out his liberal views.

    It seems to me that the SF is used by others to present things that have a political edge, eg the separation of church and state that is threatened by the imposition of religious tenets into schools and civic life (say, Creationism or Sharia law) and so it seems appropriate to put it here.

    Having been raised Catholic, I observe the continued evolution of the Church with some happiness when it takes a step forward and some sadness when it takes a step back. Serra represents a step back. Possibly politically necessary, but even that fact is sorta sad.
  4. SubscriberSuzianne
    Misfit Queen
    Isle of Misfit Toys
    Joined
    08 Aug '03
    Moves
    35531
    25 Jan '15 01:411 edit
    Originally posted by JS357
    I was of two minds about posting this here or in Debates. I have mixed feelings about Pope Francis. I think he is playing politics, giving the conservative traditionalists things that balance out his liberal views.

    It seems to me that the SF is used by others to present things that have a political edge, eg the separation of church and state that is threat ...[text shortened]... . Serra represents a step back. Possibly politically necessary, but even that fact is sorta sad.
    I have only a passing familiarity with Serra, as the article says, the Serra we learn about in 4th grade. I'm also not Catholic, so I haven't been exposed to other information on Serra. I do, however, have a few ties to the Latino community here in Phoenix, so I'll ask around and look into this a bit more as a direct result of reading the article. Thanks for posting it.
  5. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12695
    25 Jan '15 06:08
    Originally posted by JS357
    I was of two minds about posting this here or in Debates. I have mixed feelings about Pope Francis. I think he is playing politics, giving the conservative traditionalists things that balance out his liberal views.

    It seems to me that the SF is used by others to present things that have a political edge, eg the separation of church and state that is threat ...[text shortened]... . Serra represents a step back. Possibly politically necessary, but even that fact is sorta sad.
    If there is a type of real evolution, it would be nice to see it in the Church and not just the Roman Catholic Church.
  6. Joined
    29 Dec '08
    Moves
    6788
    25 Jan '15 06:391 edit
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    If there is a type of real evolution, it would be nice to see it in the Church and not just the Roman Catholic Church.
    Amen. And I think there is.
  7. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    25 Jan '15 13:18
    Originally posted by JS357
    I was of two minds about posting this here or in Debates. I have mixed feelings about Pope Francis. I think he is playing politics, giving the conservative traditionalists things that balance out his liberal views.

    It seems to me that the SF is used by others to present things that have a political edge, eg the separation of church and state that is threat ...[text shortened]... . Serra represents a step back. Possibly politically necessary, but even that fact is sorta sad.
    You nailed it.

    Pope Francis is without substance. His only goal is playing politics.

    All this will do is further erode a church that is dying.
  8. Joined
    27 Sep '06
    Moves
    9651
    25 Jan '15 20:03
    Originally posted by whodey
    You nailed it.

    Pope Francis is without substance. His only goal is playing politics.

    All this will do is further erode a church that is dying.
    Well whodey, while I agree with the sentiment the truth is there's really just one church, and it ain't dying. 😉

    These man made institutions are already dead! Although there may be believers in them.
Back to Top