Originally posted by dj2becker
Are you just trying to be silly or what?
I am saying that the statement “brain death is not reversible” is not falsifiable as it is mutually exclusive to “brain death is reversible”.
You can't say a statement is not falsifiable in a way that applies to the process of scientific falsifiability, you are meant to apply it to a theory:
I set out to discover what brain death consists of. I come up with a theory that says that brain death is the cessation of all electrical function and thereby, no clinical evidence of brain function. I make a statement of falsifiability, namely 'brain death is reversible' I test the theory and come to a conclusion that brain death is not reversible. There is nothing unscientific about this. Remember, falsifiable does not mean false.
Quite apart from this, we are discussing the definition of a term, not the scientific process behind the investigation which lead to this definition. I repeat once more, by definition, brain death is not reversible. No matter what ridiculous claims you make about falsifiability, the fact remains that brain death is defined as an irreversible state of the brain where no electircal activity is present. End of story.